MHB Prove $\left(\begin{matrix}n\\1\end{matrix}\right)=n$ - Help Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter bergausstein
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To prove that \(\left(\begin{matrix}n\\1\end{matrix}\right)=n\), the calculation begins with the formula for combinations, yielding \(\left(\begin{matrix}n\\1\end{matrix}\right)=\frac{n!}{1!(n-1)!}=\frac{n!}{(n-1)!}\). The discussion emphasizes understanding the relationship between \(n!\) and \((n-1)!\), where \(n! = n \cdot (n-1)!\). A recursive definition of factorial is introduced, stating \(n! = (n - 1)! n\) and \(1! = 1\), which simplifies the proof. The conversation suggests that using induction or the product definition of factorial can also lead to the same conclusion.
bergausstein
Messages
191
Reaction score
0
please help me with this

prove that

$\left(\begin{matrix}n\\1\end{matrix}\right)=n$

this is what I get when I try to prove it,

$\left(\begin{matrix}n\\1\end{matrix}\right)=\frac{n!}{1!(n-1)!}=\frac{n!}{(n-1)!}$

thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Proving a corrolary

bergausstein said:
please help me with this

prove that

$\left(\begin{matrix}n\\1\end{matrix}\right)=n$

this is what I get when I try to prove it,

$\left(\begin{matrix}n\\1\end{matrix}\right)=\frac{n!}{1!(n-1)!}=\frac{n!}{(n-1)!}$

thanks!

$$n! = 2 \cdot 3 \cdot 4 \cdot \cdots \cdot (n - 1) \cdot n$$

$$(n - 1)! = 2 \cdot 3 \cdot 4 \cdot \cdots \cdot (n - 1)$$

What's left when you divide $n!$ by $(n - 1)!$? In other words, what's $n!$ in terms of $(n - 1)!$? (hint: recursive definition of factorial). If this is still unsatisfactory, consider proving by induction...
 
Re: Proving a corrolary

Bacterius said:
$$n! = 2 \cdot 3 \cdot 4 \cdot \cdots \cdot (n - 1) \cdot n$$

$$(n - 1)! = 2 \cdot 3 \cdot 4 \cdot \cdots \cdot (n - 1)$$

What's left when you divide $n!$ by $(n - 1)!$? In other words, what's $n!$ in terms of $(n - 1)!$? (hint: recursive definition of factorial). If this is still unsatisfactory, consider proving by induction...

I get your point here, but what is "recurisive definition of factorial"?
 
Re: Proving a corrolary

bergausstein said:
I get your point here, but what is "recurisive definition of factorial"?

The factorial is typically defined recursively as $n! = (n - 1)! n$ and $1! = 1$, for instance:
$$5! = (5 - 1)! 5 = 4! 5 = ((4 - 1)! 4) 5 = (3! 4) 5 = ((3 - 1)! 3)4)5 = ((2! 3)4)5 = (((2 - 1)! 2)3)4)5 = (((1! 2)3)4)5 = (((2)3)4)5 = 2 \times 3 \times 4 \times 5 = 120$$
If you follow this definition, your result is immediate. If not, you can start with whatever your definition of the factorial is to arrive at the same result. For instance, if your definition is instead "product of all integers up to $n$" then you could use the product argument I gave in my previous post, or use induction (slightly tautologically, I have to say). Does that make sense?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top