Prove some relations but going round in circles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gregg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circles Relations
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster attempts to prove a relation involving angular momentum operators, specifically the commutation relation between \(\hat{J}_z\) and \(\hat{J}_+\). The context involves quantum mechanics and operator algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using commutator notation rather than expanding expressions fully. There is mention of applying general rules of algebra for commutators and manipulating terms to simplify the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem using commutator properties. The discussion reflects a mix of attempts and corrections, with one participant noting an error in their factorization.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication of complexity in the problem, with participants acknowledging that such problems can become messy. The original poster expresses difficulty in their initial approach, suggesting a need for clarity in the manipulation of operators.

Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

I need to prove some relations but going round in circles.

## [\hat{J}_z, \hat{J}_+] = \hbar J_+ ##

I've got this:

##\left(a_+^{\dagger }a_+-a_-^{\dagger }a_-\right)\left(a_+^{\dagger }a_-\right)-\left(a_+^{\dagger }a_-\right)\left(a_+^{\dagger }a_+-a_-^{\dagger }a_-\right)##

Homework Equations



##J_{\pm} = \hbar a_{\pm}^{\dagger} a_{\mp} ##

##J_z = \frac{\hbar}{2} \left(a_+^{\dagger }a_+-a_-^{\dagger }a_-\right)##

The Attempt at a Solution

I have these sort of obvious relations to work from##[a_{\pm}^{\dagger}, a_{\pm}] = 1##
##[a_{\pm}^{\dagger}, a_{\mp}] = 0##
##[a_{\pm}^{\dagger}, a_{\mp}^{\dagger}] = 0##
##[a_{\pm}^{\dagger}, a_{\mp}] = 0##
##[a_{\pm}, a_{\mp}] = 0##

I start expanding and it gets too tough, what am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd suggest working in commutator notation instead of expanding it out completely. I.e. start from:
<br /> [\hat{J_z},\hat{J_+}] = [\frac{\hbar}{2} \left(a_+^{\dagger }a_+-a_-^{\dagger }a_-\right),\hbar a_{+}^{\dagger}a_{-}]<br />

Then manipulate that using the general rules of algebra for commutators.
 
Using

## [A+B,C] = [A,C] + [B,C] ##
## [AB,C] = [A,C]B + A[B,C] ##
## [A,BC] = [A,B]C + B[A,C] ##

It quickly boils down to

##\frac{\hbar^2}{2} \hat{a}_{+}^{\dagger} \hat{a}_{-} ##

I am out by a factor of half but I'm sure it works!
 
Yes it works fine, I factored a half out of the commutator wrongly. Thanks!
 
Sweet! I'm glad it worked out. These types of problems can and will get messy sometimes. Good thing I didn't have to puzzle through it myself. :P
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K