I  Find Two Equal Length Paths in a Tree Graph

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that in any simple graph with more than two vertices, two equal paths of maximal length must intersect. The initial idea presented involves using an extremal argument to demonstrate that if two distinct paths of equal length exist, the graph would not remain connected. Participants clarify that the title of the thread was incomplete, which led to confusion about the problem statement. It is confirmed that either the maximal length paths share common vertices or the graph is not connected. The conversation emphasizes the necessity of intersection for the paths in question.
Superyoshiom
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
In order to try and sovle this problem, my idea here was to use an extremal argument, with two equal length maximum paths on a tree. I said that no matter where the two graphs started, they'd end up having to cross paths since if there were two distinct paths with equal lengths the graph would no longer be connected; the paths still needed to intersect.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Superyoshiom said:
In order to try and sovle this problem, my idea here was to use an extremal argument, with two equal length maximum paths on a tree. I said that no matter where the two graphs started, they'd end up having to cross paths since if there were two distinct paths with equal lengths the graph would no longer be connected; the paths still needed to intersect.
What exactly are you trying to prove?

The title says "Prove that in any simple graph with more than two vertices, two equal"
which is a fragment that doesn't state the full problem... I don't see the problem stated in the body here either.
 
StoneTemplePython said:
What exactly are you trying to prove?

The title says "Prove that in any simple graph with more than two vertices, two equal"
which is a fragment that doesn't state the full problem... I don't see the problem stated in the body here either.
I'm sorry, the title cut off for some reason, it should say: "Prove that in any simple graph with more than two vertices, two equal paths of maximal length must intersect."
 
Superyoshiom said:
I'm sorry, the title cut off for some reason, it should say: "Prove that in any simple graph with more than two vertices, two equal paths of maximal length must intersect."
Got it. This was, basically, a homework problem in the calculus forums last week. And your sketch is right -- either there are common vertices in these maximal length paths or the graph isn't connected
 
Superyoshiom said:
I'm sorry, the title cut off for some reason, it should say: "Prove that in any simple graph with more than two vertices, two equal paths of maximal length must intersect."
I've updated your thread title for you.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top