Prove that n.1 + (n-1).2 + (n-2).33.(n-2) + 2.(n-1) + 1.n = n(n+1)(n+2)/6 By

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arnab Chattar
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the equation n.1 + (n-1).2 + (n-2).3 + ... + 2.(n-1) + 1.n = n(n+1)(n+2)/6. Participants debate the validity of substituting n=1 into the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS) of the equation. One participant argues that substituting n=1 is incorrect, while others clarify that it is valid as it results in both sides equating to 1. The proof involves manipulating the summation and applying formulas for sums of integers and squares. Ultimately, the discussion confirms that the equation holds true for n=1 and provides a pathway to general proof.
Arnab Chattar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Prove that n.1 + (n-1).2 + (n-2).3 ... 3.(n-2) + 2.(n-1) + 1.n = n(n+1)(n+2)/6 By

You can't put n=1 in the L.H.S, when we take p(1) it means the first term i.e. 'n.1' and in the R.H.S n=1 should be put that means p(1) : n.1=1 which is wrong...now can you answer it...please solve it??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

HI Arnab! Welcome to PF! :wink:
Arnab Chattar said:
You can't put n=1 in the L.H.S …

Yes we can …

the LHS has n terms, so if n = 1, that's 1 term, and the LHS is 1
.1 = 1 (and the RHS is 1.2.3/6 = 1 also). :smile:
 


Yes, by plugging in n=1, we consider the first term only on LHS and that is = 1
Also substituting n = 1 on RHS, we get 1
Hence, nothing wrong when n=1
 


\begin{aligned}\sum_{k=1}^{n} (n-k+1)k = (n+1)\sum_{k=1}^{n}k-\sum_{k=1}^{n}k^2= (n+1)\left[ \frac{1}{2} n (n+1)\right]-\frac{1}{6}n (n+1) (2 n+1) = \frac{1}{6}n (n+1) (n+2).\end{aligned}
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top