Prove that the limit of this matrix expression is 0

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the limit of a matrix expression involving a singular matrix and its characteristic polynomial. Participants explore various mathematical approaches and concepts related to limits, matrix inverses, and the Cayley-Hamilton theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes to prove that the limit of the expression $$\lim_{t\to 0} (\chi_A(B) + \det(B)I)B^{-1} = 0$$ where ##B = A - tI## and ##\chi_A## is the characteristic polynomial of ##A##.
  • Another participant expresses confusion regarding the definition of the characteristic polynomial, noting a discrepancy between the matrix ##B## and the parameter ##t## as described in Wikipedia.
  • A participant suggests multiple approaches for tackling the problem, including proof by induction, using the Jordan normal form, and considering the limit entry-wise.
  • One participant expands on the expression by rewriting it in terms of the coefficients of the characteristic polynomial and the adjugate matrix, indicating that the limit may depend on whether the degree of the polynomial is odd or even.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on how to approach the proof or the implications of the limit, with various methods and interpretations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the transformation of the limit and the implications of the characteristic polynomial's degree on the final result.

lriuui0x0
Messages
101
Reaction score
25
Given a singular matrix ##A##, let ##B = A - tI## for small positive ##t## such that ##B## is non-singular. Prove that:

$$
\lim_{t\to 0} (\chi_A(B) + \det(B)I)B^{-1} = 0
$$

where ##\chi_A## is the characteristic polynomial of ##A##. Note that ##\lim_{t\to 0} \chi_A(B) = \chi_A(A) = 0## by Cayley-Hamilton theorem.

This limit involves the product of a convergent to zero function and a divergent function. I'm not sure how to transform the limit in order to prove this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In wikipedia characteristic polynomials
----
We consider an n×n matrix A. The characteristic polynomial of A, denoted by pA(t), is the polynomial defined by[5]
{\displaystyle p_{A}(t)=\det \left(tI-A\right)}
where I denotes the n×n identity matrix.
----
Wiki says parameter of characteristic polynomial t a number though you say it B, a matrix. I am confused.
 
anuttarasammyak said:
In wikipedia characteristic polynomials
----
We consider an n×n matrix A. The characteristic polynomial of A, denoted by pA(t), is the polynomial defined by[5]
{\displaystyle p_{A}(t)=\det \left(tI-A\right)}
where I denotes the n×n identity matrix.
----
Wiki says parameter of characteristic polynomial t a number though you say it B, a matrix. I am confused.
Yes, it's passing in the matrix into the polynomial. Please check Cayley-Hamilton theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak
I don't know how to tackle the problem, but here are some ideas:
  • proof by induction
  • replacing ##B^{-1}=\dfrac{1}{A-tI}## by its series
  • using the Jordan normal form
  • the limit has to be taken for every matrix entry, so maybe choosing a single one could simplify the problem
 
Let \chi_A(x) = \sum_{n=0}^N a_nx^n. Then <br /> (\chi_A(B) + \det(B)I)B^{-1} = (a_0 + \det B)B^{-1} + \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} a_{n+1}B^{n}. Recall that B^{-1} = \frac{\operatorname{adj}(B)}{\det(B)} where \operatorname{adj}(B) is the adjugate matrix of B, and that a_0 vanishes as A is singular. This shows that the limit is finite; there is more to do to show that it vanishes.

EDIT: We also have the identity (stated here) <br /> \operatorname{adj}(-A) = \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} a_{n+1}A^n and thus <br /> \lim_{t \to 0} (\chi_A(B) + \det(B)I)B^{-1} = \operatorname{adj}(A) + \operatorname{adj}(-A) = (1 + (-1)^{N-1})\operatorname{adj}(A) which is either 2\operatorname{adj}(A) or 0 depending on whether N is odd or even.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K