Prove that the limit of this matrix expression is 0

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of the matrix expression $$\lim_{t\to 0} (\chi_A(B) + \det(B)I)B^{-1}$$ is proven to be 0 for a singular matrix ##A##, where ##B = A - tI## and ##B## is non-singular for small positive ##t##. The Cayley-Hamilton theorem confirms that $$\lim_{t\to 0} \chi_A(B) = 0$$. The proof involves using the adjugate matrix and properties of the characteristic polynomial, leading to the conclusion that the limit is finite and vanishes based on the parity of the degree of the polynomial.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Cayley-Hamilton theorem
  • Familiarity with characteristic polynomials and their properties
  • Knowledge of matrix adjugates and inverses
  • Basic concepts of limits in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Cayley-Hamilton theorem in detail
  • Learn about the properties of adjugate matrices
  • Explore the concept of matrix limits and convergence
  • Investigate proof techniques such as mathematical induction in linear algebra
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying linear algebra, and researchers focusing on matrix theory and polynomial properties will benefit from this discussion.

lriuui0x0
Messages
101
Reaction score
25
Given a singular matrix ##A##, let ##B = A - tI## for small positive ##t## such that ##B## is non-singular. Prove that:

$$
\lim_{t\to 0} (\chi_A(B) + \det(B)I)B^{-1} = 0
$$

where ##\chi_A## is the characteristic polynomial of ##A##. Note that ##\lim_{t\to 0} \chi_A(B) = \chi_A(A) = 0## by Cayley-Hamilton theorem.

This limit involves the product of a convergent to zero function and a divergent function. I'm not sure how to transform the limit in order to prove this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In wikipedia characteristic polynomials
----
We consider an n×n matrix A. The characteristic polynomial of A, denoted by pA(t), is the polynomial defined by[5]
{\displaystyle p_{A}(t)=\det \left(tI-A\right)}
where I denotes the n×n identity matrix.
----
Wiki says parameter of characteristic polynomial t a number though you say it B, a matrix. I am confused.
 
anuttarasammyak said:
In wikipedia characteristic polynomials
----
We consider an n×n matrix A. The characteristic polynomial of A, denoted by pA(t), is the polynomial defined by[5]
{\displaystyle p_{A}(t)=\det \left(tI-A\right)}
where I denotes the n×n identity matrix.
----
Wiki says parameter of characteristic polynomial t a number though you say it B, a matrix. I am confused.
Yes, it's passing in the matrix into the polynomial. Please check Cayley-Hamilton theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak
I don't know how to tackle the problem, but here are some ideas:
  • proof by induction
  • replacing ##B^{-1}=\dfrac{1}{A-tI}## by its series
  • using the Jordan normal form
  • the limit has to be taken for every matrix entry, so maybe choosing a single one could simplify the problem
 
Let \chi_A(x) = \sum_{n=0}^N a_nx^n. Then <br /> (\chi_A(B) + \det(B)I)B^{-1} = (a_0 + \det B)B^{-1} + \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} a_{n+1}B^{n}. Recall that B^{-1} = \frac{\operatorname{adj}(B)}{\det(B)} where \operatorname{adj}(B) is the adjugate matrix of B, and that a_0 vanishes as A is singular. This shows that the limit is finite; there is more to do to show that it vanishes.

EDIT: We also have the identity (stated here) <br /> \operatorname{adj}(-A) = \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} a_{n+1}A^n and thus <br /> \lim_{t \to 0} (\chi_A(B) + \det(B)I)B^{-1} = \operatorname{adj}(A) + \operatorname{adj}(-A) = (1 + (-1)^{N-1})\operatorname{adj}(A) which is either 2\operatorname{adj}(A) or 0 depending on whether N is odd or even.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K