Prove the boundary of rationals is real

  • Thread starter Thread starter kekido
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boundary
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that the boundary of the set of rational numbers, denoted as bd(Q), is equal to the set of real numbers, R. The discussion centers around definitions of boundary points and the properties of rational and irrational numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definitions of "boundary" and "boundary point," with some suggesting that understanding these definitions is crucial for addressing the problem. There are attempts to clarify the meaning of intervals and neighborhoods in relation to the boundary of the rationals.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring definitions and properties related to the boundary of the rationals. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for rigorous proof and the importance of definitions, but no consensus has been reached on a specific approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of the density of rational numbers within the real numbers and the need to rigorously demonstrate that the boundary of the rationals includes all real numbers. Participants also note the importance of precise language in mathematical definitions.

kekido
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let [tex]Q[/tex] be the set of all rational numbers
Prove [tex]bd(Q)=R[/tex]

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


Let x be a real number, then since the interval |x-r| contains both rationals and irrationals for arbitrary small r, so R is the boundary of Q. Is that right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Slow down a bit. What, exactly, is the definition of "boundary" and "boundary point". If you can answer that you should be able to answer your own question. (I might point out that, strictly speaking, |x-r| is not an interval, it is a number! You mean either the interval (x-r, x+r) or the set {y| |x-y|< r}.)
 
I would assume that
  • The boundary is the closure minus the interior
  • A point is in the closure if every epsilon-ball around it has non-empty intersection with the set
  • A point is in the interior if there is an epsilon-ball which fits entirely in the set

From these definitions it is quite straightforward to prove what the boundary of |R is, given (or proven) that the rationals are dense.

So kekido, your idea is right, but if you want to do it rigorously you should put a little more work into it (show that it satisfies the definitions yadayada andsoforth).
 
HallsofIvy said:
Slow down a bit. What, exactly, is the definition of "boundary" and "boundary point". If you can answer that you should be able to answer your own question. (I might point out that, strictly speaking, |x-r| is not an interval, it is a number! You mean either the interval (x-r, x+r) or the set {y| |x-y|< r}.)

Ok, here "boundary" is the set of all boundary points, i.e., [tex]\partial(Q)=R[/tex]

You're right, the interval should be like what you said. I was being sloppy here.

Since the boundary point is defined as for every neighbourhood of the point, it contains both points in S and [tex]S^c[/tex], so here every small interval of an arbitrary real number contains both rationals and irrationals, so [tex]\partial(Q)=R[/tex] and also [tex]\partial(Q^c)=R[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K