Prove the mean of the weibull distribution

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chantry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Distribution Mean
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the mean of the Weibull distribution, specifically showing that u = a^(-1/b) * gamma(1 + 1/b). The probability density function is defined as f(x) = kx^(b-1) * exp(-ax^b) for x > 0, with k determined to be ab. The solution involves using substitution and integration techniques, particularly the gamma function, to simplify the integral and arrive at the mean.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Weibull distribution and its probability density function.
  • Familiarity with integration techniques, including integration by parts.
  • Knowledge of the gamma function and its properties.
  • Ability to perform variable substitution in integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Weibull distribution in depth.
  • Learn advanced integration techniques, focusing on integration by substitution.
  • Explore the gamma function and its applications in probability and statistics.
  • Practice solving integrals involving exponential functions and power terms.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying probability and statistics, mathematicians focusing on distribution functions, and anyone involved in statistical modeling using the Weibull distribution.

Chantry
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is the full question, but we're only asked to do b.

A random variable x has a Weibull Distribution if and only if its probability density is given by f(x) = {kx^(b-a) *exp(-ax^b) for x > 0 }
where a and b > 0.

a) Express k in terms of a and b.
b) Show that u = a^(-1/b) * gamma(1 + 1/b)

Homework Equations



All of the following could be of use.
Mx(t) = ∫exp(xt)f(x) dx
and the limit as t → 0 of M'x(t) = u = mean
u = Ex(x) = ∫xf(x)dx
gamma(a) = ∫x^(1-a)exp(-x)dx

Also the integral of f(x) = 1.

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried making a substitution for x, so that I could get the gamma function out of the integral, but that x^b really throws me.

I tried integrating by parts, but that just gives an even more complicated expression. I wanted to get rid of part of the equation by setting it to one, but no matter how you treat it you'll have a nasty exp(-ax^b) to deal with.

There's obviously some trick I'm supposed to use to figure it out.

Can anyone provide any hints? I've spent a good couple hours both trying to solve it and googling similar solutions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bumping back to first page.
 
What substitution did you try? What is the obvious one to get rid of the power within the exponential?
 
Not sure why, but it's not letting me edit the first post.

It should be kx^(b-1) *exp(-ax^b) not ∫kx^(b-a) *exp(-ax^b), but anyway, I took another crack at it and I solved it!

u = ax^b
du = abx^(b-1) dx

∫kx^(b-1) *exp(-ax^b) dx
= k/(ab)∫exp(-u) du
= k/ab[1] = 1, so k = ab.

∫kx^(b) *exp(-ax^b) dx
= k∫x^(b) *exp(-ax^b) dx
= k/(ab)∫(u/a)^(1/b) exp(-u)du
= a^(-1/b)k/(ab) ∫u^(1/b) exp(-u) du
= a^(-1/b-1)k/b Γ(1/b + 1)
sub k = ab in and you get
=a^(-1/b)Γ(1/b + 1)

Thanks a lot! I guess I just needed to know that substitution was the method to solve it for me to be able to do the math.
 
Last edited:
Good show.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K