Proving 139/159 is Not an Upper Bound for E = {(14n + 11)/(16n + 19): n ε N}

  • Thread starter Thread starter teme92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
teme92
Messages
185
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Prove that 139/159 is not an upper bound for the set of real numbers:

E ={(14n + 11)/(16n + 19): n ε N}


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Right so I let 14n + 11 = 139 and I got n=9.14. Since n is supposed to be natural and the answer I got for n isn't, can I deduce that 139/159 is not an upper bound for E?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to find a positive integer such that if you plug it into (14n + 11)/(16n + 19) you get a number greater than 139/159.

 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hey shortydeb thanks for the quick reply.

That is what I originally thought but do I not need to get a number n that lies before and after 139/159 but not exactly on it? Its very tedious work if that is the case :/
 
Set (14n + 11)/(16n + 19) equal to 139/159 and see what you get for n.
 
teme92 said:
Hey shortydeb thanks for the quick reply.

That is what I originally thought but do I not need to get a number n that lies before and after 139/159 but not exactly on it? Its very tedious work if that is the case :/

No. All you need do is find an integer n giving the fraction > 139/159. You do not need to find the "best" or "nearest" n, or anything like that.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ok I get it now so. Thanks for the help much appreciated
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top