Proving 3^n >= 2n+1 by Induction

  • Thread starter Thread starter It_Angel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the inequality 3^n >= 2n+1 for all natural numbers using mathematical induction. The initial base case for n=1 is confirmed to be true. The user proposes an assumption for k and attempts to extend the proof to k+1 but is unsure about substituting values directly. Responses emphasize the need to correctly apply the induction hypothesis and provide a clearer path for the proof. Clarification is sought on the proper steps to complete the induction process effectively.
It_Angel
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that 3^n >= 2n+1 for all natural numbers.


Homework Equations


3^n >= 2n+1 [is bigger or equal to]


The Attempt at a Solution



3*1>=2+1
True for n=1

Assumption: 3^k>=2k+1

3^(k+1)>=2k+3
3^k*3>=2k+3
(2k+1)*3>=2k+3 <---can I just substitute 2k+1 into 3^k as per my assumption, because 3^k is bigger, and (2k+1)*3 is bigger than 2k+3? If so, is the proof complete?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It_Angel said:

Homework Statement


Prove that 3^n >= 2n+1 for all natural numbers.


Homework Equations


3^n >= 2n+1 [is bigger or equal to]


The Attempt at a Solution



3*1>=2+1
True for n=1

Assumption: 3^k>=2k+1

3^(k+1)>=2k+3[/color]
No, you can't just assert this -- you have to show it.

Use the fact that 3^(k + 1) = 3 * 3k, and use your assumption that 3^i >= 2k + 1.
It_Angel said:
3^k*3>=2k+3
(2k+1)*3>=2k+3 <---can I just substitute 2k+1 into 3^k as per my assumption, because 3^k is bigger, and (2k+1)*3 is bigger than 2k+3? If so, is the proof complete?

Thanks in advance.
 
Sorry, still at a loss.
 
I already provided a strategy for you.
Mark44 said:
Use the fact that 3^(k + 1) = 3 * 3k, and use your assumption that 3^i >= 2k + 1.

Did you not understand?
 
Back
Top