Proving a/b < (a+c)/(b+d) for Positive Numbers: A First Course in Calculus

  • Thread starter Thread starter dmcharg
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving an inequality involving positive numbers, specifically showing that if \( a/b > c/d \), then \( a/b < (a+c)/(b+d) \). The context is rooted in calculus, as referenced by the original poster's study material.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different methods to approach the proof, including multiplying both sides of the inequality. Some question the validity of the original inequality and discuss the implications of the assumptions made regarding the positivity of the variables.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the inequality, with some participants providing insights into potential methods and questioning the assumptions. A participant has pointed out a possible error in the direction of the inequality, prompting further reflection on the approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the surrounding material in the textbook, suggesting that related concepts such as the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality or the triangle inequality may provide useful insights for tackling the problem.

dmcharg
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi
I am working my way through Serge Langs A first course in Calculus and have encountered this question/proof which i am not sure how to do. Any assistance much appreciated.

Let a,b,c,d > 0 such that a/b > c/d Prove that

a/b < (a+c)/(b+d)

?

Thanks
David.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
IN which section is this? The surrounding material may well be helpful - is it near stuff on cauchy schwartz, or the triangle inequality? Or something else entirely? My experience with this type of question is that it is 'easy' with the right method, and impossible if you don't know/guess it. Any similar questions in the text near this one may well give you plenty of insight.
 
My first thought would be to multiply both sides of the inequality by b and b+ d.
 
dmcharg said:
Let a,b,c,d > 0 such that a/b > c/d Prove that

a/b < (a+c)/(b+d)

It is wrong.
If a/b > c/d , then
ad > bc , or
ab+ad > ab+bc , or
a(b+d) > b(a+c) , or
a/b > (a+c)/(b+d)

That's all.
 
Thanks. Yes i got the direction of the inequality the wrong way round but i see your approach. First multiply both side by b, then d and then add ab to both sides, all of which can only be done on the assumption that all values are > 0 and hence preserving the direction of the inequality.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K