Proving a Function is Rieman Integrable

  • Thread starter Thread starter SNOOTCHIEBOOCHEE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the Riemann integrability of a piecewise function defined on the interval [0, 1]. The function takes the value of 1 at specific points in the set E = {1/n : n ∈ N} and 0 elsewhere in the interval.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of integrability and discuss the implications of choosing appropriate partitions. There is an attempt to determine the lower and upper sums for various partitions and how they relate to the epsilon condition for integrability.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights about partition choices and the implications of their lengths on the integrability condition. Some guidance has been offered regarding the selection of partitions and ensuring the total length of certain intervals meets the required criteria.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the formal definition of Riemann integrability and are attempting to navigate the complexities of the function's behavior at specific points. There is an acknowledgment of the need for careful selection of partitions to satisfy the epsilon condition.

SNOOTCHIEBOOCHEE
Messages
141
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that
f(x) = 1 x (element) E = {1/n : n (element) N}
0 x (element) [0,1]\E
is integrable on [0, 1] by using the definition of integrability

Homework Equations



Definition of Integrability: Let f be a bounded function. for each epsilon greater than 0 there exists a partition P such that. U(f,P)- L(f,P)< epsilon

The Attempt at a Solution



Fix \epsilon >0

I think that for any partition P, L(f,P) is gunna be zero. Since mk will always be 0 for all k.

so all we need to do is find a partition P such that U(f,P) < \epsilon

i could be completely wrong up to this step, and even if I am not, i don't know how to go about choosing P. HELP MEH PLZ!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A partition of [0,1] may have the form {0,1/k,t_1,...,t_s = 1}. On [0,1/k] sup(f)=1. On [1/k,1] there are now only a finite number of elements for which f = 1, namely, x = 1,1/2,1/3,...,1/k. If you choose k large enough so that 1/k < \epsilon/2 and you have a finite number of elements remaining for which f = 1, you need to make sure that the subintervals surrounding 1,...1/(k-1) can also have a total summed length < \epsilon/2. I leave the rest to you.
 
Ok I am still having trouble with this.

from what i can tell the picture looks like this: http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c373/SNOOTCHIEBOOCHEE/Graph.jpg

Sorry for the crude drawing.

Anyways. so 1/k <epsilon/2

that means that the whole area from [0,1/k] must be < epsilon/2. I understand this and can write it out using sigma notation...

Now choosing the the intervals around the other parts are proving to be difficult for me. I know they have to sum up to be less than Epsilon/2.

So what i am thinking is that if we make the with of the partitions epsilon/k, that the maximum value of the area of the graph will also be epsilon/2. Is this correct?
 
Close. I think you want to make sure that the subintervals have length less than \epsilon/2k.
 
ya that's what i meant. Thank you sir.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K