Proving a limit for a multi-variable equaton

bosox09
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Using the definition of a limit, prove that

lim(x, y) --> (0,0) (x^2*y^2) / (x^2 + 2y^2) = 0

Homework Equations



Now, I know that the limit of f(x, y) as (x, y) approaches (a, b) is L such that lim (x, y) --> (a, b) f(x, y) = L. Also, for every number epsilon > 0, there is a delta > 0 such that |f(x, y) - L| < epsilon.

I believe the above is the definition of a limit of two variables.

The Attempt at a Solution



In a sense, f(x, y) --> L (two VALUES) as (x, y) --> (a, b) (two POINTS). By making the distance between points (x, y) and (a, b) extremely small (some value epsilon), we make the distance between f(x, y) and L (some value delta) subsequently small. For any interval [L - epsilon, L + epsilon], there is a subsequent plane with center (a, b) and radius delta > 0 satisfying this.

What I want to do is use some very small value of epsilon to find a value of delta that satisfies the definition of a limit.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally, for problems like this, the best thing to do is to change to polar coordinates: x= rcos(\theta), y= rsin(\theta) because then r alone measures how close to (0,0) we are. If the limit as r goes to 0 is independent of \theta, then the limit exists and is that value. If the limit as r goes to 0 depends on \theta then the limit of the function does not exist.
 
|\frac{x^2y^2}{x^2+2y^2}-0|=|\frac{x^2y^2}{x^2+2y^2}|=|\frac{x^2}{x^2+2y^2}y^2|=|\frac{x^2}{x^2+2y^2}|y^2&lt;y^2&lt;x^2+y^2&lt;\delta^2=\epsilon

So for a choice of :

\delta=\sqrt{\epsilon} it would work out.


x^2&lt;x^2+2y^2=&gt;\frac{1}{x^2+2y^2}&lt;\frac{1}{x^2}=&gt;\frac{x^2}{x^2+2y^2}&lt;1


x^2+y^2&lt;\delta^2

edit: Halls suggestion is correct and helpful no doubt. but you have more options now!
 
Thank you, you guys were very helpful!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top