MHB Can the RMS-AM inequality prove the combinatorial coefficient inequality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saitama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the inequality involving the sum of square roots of combinatorial coefficients from the expansion of (1+x)^n. The initial approach utilizes the RMS-AM inequality, leading to the expression that the sum is less than or equal to the square root of (2^n - 1) divided by n. Participants explore how to prove the relationship (2^n - 1)*n ≥ (2^n - 1)/n, confirming that n is a natural number greater than or equal to 1. The conversation concludes with one participant expressing gratitude for the assistance in reaching the solution. The discussion highlights the application of inequalities in combinatorial contexts.
Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93
Problem:
Prove:
$$\sqrt{C_1}+\sqrt{C_2}+\sqrt{C_3}+...+\sqrt{C_n} \leq 2^{n-1}+\frac{n-1}{2}$$

where $C_0,C_1,C_2,...,C_n$ are combinatorial coefficients in the expansion of $(1+x)^n$, $n \in \mathbb{N}$.

Attempt:

I thought of using the RMS-AM inequality and got:

$$\sqrt{C_1}+\sqrt{C_2}+\sqrt{C_3}+...+\sqrt{C_n} \leq \sqrt{\frac{2^n-1}{n}}$$

Where I have used $C_1+C_2+C_3+...+C_n=2^n-1$.

But I don't see how to proceed from here.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
use
$$(2^n-1)*n\geq\frac{(2^n-1)}{n}$$
and then $$AM\geq GM$$
for $$2^n-1$$ and $$n$$
 
mathworker said:
use
$$(2^n-1)*n\geq\frac{(2^n-1)}{n}$$
and then $$AM\geq GM$$
for $$2^n-1$$ and $$n$$

Thanks mathworker!

I was able to reach the answer but how do you prove $(2^n-1)*n\geq\frac{(2^n-1)}{n}$? :confused:
 
as $$C_0,C_1,C_2,...,C_n$$ are combinatorial coeffs of $$(1+x)^n$$. n is certainly an integer which is $$\geq 1 $$.
the rest is obvious...:)
 
mathworker said:
as $$C_0,C_1,C_2,...,C_n$$ are combinatorial coeffs of $$(1+x)^n$$. n is certainly an integer which is $$\geq 1 $$.
the rest is obvious...:)

Understood, thanks a lot mathworker! :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top