Proving Another Vector Norm on C[0,1]

  • Thread starter Thread starter gtfitzpatrick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Norm Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function defined by \|f\| = |f(1) - f(0)| does not constitute a norm on C[0,1]. The failure occurs specifically with the second axiom of a norm, which states that \|f\| = 0 if and only if f is the zero function. A counterexample is provided where f(x) = 1, leading to \|f\| = |1 - 1| = 0, despite f not being the zero function. Thus, the proposed function fails to satisfy the necessary conditions to be classified as a norm.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of norm definitions in functional analysis
  • Familiarity with the properties of functions in C[0,1]
  • Knowledge of the four axioms of norms
  • Basic skills in constructing mathematical proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of norms in functional analysis
  • Explore alternative norms on C[0,1], such as the supremum norm
  • Learn about counterexamples in mathematical proofs
  • Investigate the implications of norm failure in functional spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying functional analysis, and educators looking to understand norm properties and their implications in vector spaces.

gtfitzpatrick
Messages
372
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



does the function <br /> \| \|: C[0,1] \rightarrow<br /> R defined by <br /> \|f \|= |f(1)- f(0)|<br /> define a norm on C[0,1]. if it does prove all axioms if not show axiom which fails

The Attempt at a Solution



i don't really understand the question. i know the 4 axioms of a norm but i don't know how to use the info given to prove or disprove them. is the question telling me that x has to be either 0 or 1 and y has to be either 0 or 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wait so its actually telling me its a straight line at y=1 between the points x=0 and x=1. so f(1) = 1 and f(0) = 1

so axiom 2 fails <br /> <br /> \|f \| = 0<br /> <br /> iff f = \vec 0 but <br /> <br /> \|f \|= |f(1)- f(0)| = |1- 1| = 0 <br /> <br />
 
Your words and reasoning seem garbled, but your counterexample is correct: \|f\| = |f(1) - f(0)| does not define a norm on C[0,1], because if f(x) = 1 is the constant function then \|f\| = |1 - 1| = 0 even though f \neq 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K