Proving Integral Norms on C[0,1] for Continuous Functions

  • Thread starter Thread starter cummings12332
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Norm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that certain integral norms, specifically ||f||1 = ∫|f| from 0 to 1 and ||f|| = ∫t|f(t)|dt, define norms on the space of continuous functions C[0,1]. Participants are exploring the necessary conditions for these norms and how to demonstrate their validity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to prove the properties of norms, particularly focusing on the condition that ||v|| > 0 implies v ≠ 0. Questions are raised about the behavior of continuous functions near points where they are nonzero or positive.

Discussion Status

Some participants have made progress on the first norm but express uncertainty regarding the second norm involving t|f(t)|. There is an ongoing exploration of inequalities related to integrals and how they apply to the norms being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of continuity and the properties of integrals, particularly in relation to the norms defined on C[0,1]. There is a focus on ensuring that certain values remain positive within the context of the proofs.

cummings12332
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


show that ||f||1 = ∫|f| (integral from 0 to 1) does define a norm on the subspace C[0,1] of continuous functions

and also the same for ||f||= ∫t|f(t)|dt is a norm on C[0,1]


Homework Equations



(there are 3 conditions , i just don't know how to prove that ||v||>0,||v||=0 implies v=0)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cummings12332 said:

Homework Statement


show that ||f||1 = ∫|f| (integral from 0 to 1) does define a norm on the subspace C[0,1] of continuous functions

and also the same for ||f||= ∫t|f(t)|dt is a norm on C[0,1]

Homework Equations



(there are 3 conditions , i just don't know how to prove that ||v||>0,||v||=0 implies v=0)

If a continuous function is nonzero (or positive) at a point, what about its value nearby that point, and why?
 
LCKurtz said:
If a continuous function is nonzero (or positive) at a point, what about its value nearby that point, and why?

yes if it is not zero ,then |f(x)-f(c)|<esillope then choose esillope to be f(c)/2 then it will get |f(x)|>sth... but how can u ensure that f(c) >0 for esillope has to be >0
 
cummings12332 said:
yes if it is not zero ,then |f(x)-f(c)|<esillope then choose esillope to be f(c)/2 then it will get |f(x)|>sth... but how can u ensure that f(c) >0 for esillope has to be >0

You have this property of integrals to work with: If ##f,g\in C[a,b]## and ##f(x)> g(x)## on [a,b] then ##\int_a^b f(x)\, dx > \int_a^b g(x)\, dx##
 
LCKurtz said:
You have this property of integrals to work with: If ##f,g\in C[a,b]## and ##f(x)> g(x)## on [a,b] then ##\int_a^b f(x)\, dx > \int_a^b g(x)\, dx##

yes,i worked out the first one now,but how about the secound one for t f(t) i don't know how to construct the inequality that u have mentioned above..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K