Proving associativity is a structural property

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that associativity is a structural property of a binary operation. The original poster initially confuses commutativity with associativity while attempting to formulate a proof.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of associativity and structural properties, questioning the original poster's understanding and direction. There is a focus on how associativity relates to isomorphic structures.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's confusion, clarifying terms and guiding towards a more accurate understanding of the proof's requirements. Some have provided insights into the nature of structural properties and how to approach the proof.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion between the terms "commutative" and "associative," which has led to questions about definitions and the nature of the proof being sought. The discussion also highlights the need for a clear definition of "structural property."

kathrynag
Messages
595
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Give a proof for the operation * is commutative being a structural property.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


* is commutative
I know this means that I have to show (a*b)*c=a*(b*c)
I'm not sure where to go now
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the definition of *, and what do you mean by "structural property"?
 
kathrynag said:

The Attempt at a Solution


* is commutative
I know this means that I have to show (a*b)*c=a*(b*c)

You're confusing "commutative" and "associative".
 
oops, I menat to say associative. So, is that the right first step?
 
There's no way to tell if you're going in the right direction until you answer Citran's question. What is the definition of "structural property"?
 
A structural property of a binary structure is one that must be shared by any isomorphic structure.
 
* is just any arbitrary operation
 
Okay, so you want to show that associativity of a binary operation is preserved under isomorphisms. That is, if [itex](S,\ \ast)[/itex] and [itex](T,\ \star)[/itex] are isomorphic binary structures, and [itex]\ast[/itex] is associative, then [itex]\star[/itex] is also associative. Is that right?

If so, then what you will want to do is start by letting [itex](S,\ \ast)[/itex] and [itex](T,\ \star)[/itex] be arbitrary isomorphic binary structures with an isomorphism [itex]\varphi: S \rightarrow T[/itex] between them. Then assume that [itex]\ast[/itex] is associative, and use that and the isomorphism to show that [itex]\star[/itex] is associative.
 
That makes a lot more sense to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K