Proving B.(Gradient . B) - B X (Gradient X B)=Del{i}B{i}B{j}

  • Thread starter Thread starter hellomynameisscottt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the vector identity B.(Gradient . B) - B X(Gradient X B)=Del{i}[B{i}B{j} -1/2 (kroneker delta {ij} B^2]. The user expresses uncertainty about maintaining the Kronecker delta on the right-hand side and references a standard vector identity from Jackson's textbook, specifically equation (6.119). The solution involves using Levi-Civita notation to simplify the term B X (Gradient X B) and applying the identity for vector calculus. Additional context is provided by linking to a related question on Levi-Civita notation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus identities
  • Familiarity with Levi-Civita notation
  • Knowledge of Kronecker delta properties
  • Experience with Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics, specifically equation (6.119)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector calculus identities in depth
  • Learn about Levi-Civita notation and its applications
  • Review Kronecker delta and its role in tensor calculus
  • Examine Jackson's Classical Electrodynamics for further examples
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism and vector calculus, will benefit from this discussion.

hellomynameisscottt
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to prove B.(Gradient . B) - B X(Gradient X B)=Del{i} [B{i}B{j} -1/2 (kroneker delta {ij} B^2]

where I have used . as the dot product, {} as subscript. Thank you!

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I have attempted the solution but am not sure how it is possible to keep a kroneker delta on the right hand side.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can not read your complete statement above, but this looks like it comes from a standard vector identity: (where ## A ## and ## B ## are both equal to ## B ##).
## \nabla (A \cdot B)=(A \cdot \nabla) B +(B \cdot \nabla) A+A \times \nabla \times B+B \times \nabla \times A ##
 
I have uploaded the page from Jackson it is equation (6.119) I am trying to prove, however I must use Levi Cevita notation.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4558.JPG
    IMG_4558.JPG
    67.7 KB · Views: 482
hellomynameisscottt said:
I have uploaded the page from Jackson it is equation (6.119) I am trying to prove, however I must use Levi Cevita notation.
On the left side of the equation in your OP, they are only taking one component. You may be able to use the identity I presented to simplify the ## B \times \nabla \times B ## term.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K