Proving B.(Gradient . B) - B X (Gradient X B)=Del{i}B{i}B{j}

  • Thread starter Thread starter hellomynameisscottt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster attempts to prove a vector identity involving the magnetic field vector B and its derivatives, specifically relating to the gradient and the Levi-Civita notation. The context appears to be rooted in advanced electromagnetism or vector calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of standard vector identities and the implications of using Levi-Civita notation. Some question how to manage the Kronecker delta on the right-hand side of the equation. Others suggest simplifying terms using known identities.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the original statement and explore relevant vector identities. Some participants have provided guidance on simplifying specific terms, while others are seeking further clarification on notation and assumptions.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a specific equation from Jackson's text, and the discussion references the need to adhere to Levi-Civita notation. Additionally, a related question has been pointed out in another thread, suggesting a broader context for the inquiry.

hellomynameisscottt
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to prove B.(Gradient . B) - B X(Gradient X B)=Del{i} [B{i}B{j} -1/2 (kroneker delta {ij} B^2]

where I have used . as the dot product, {} as subscript. Thank you!

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I have attempted the solution but am not sure how it is possible to keep a kroneker delta on the right hand side.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I can not read your complete statement above, but this looks like it comes from a standard vector identity: (where ## A ## and ## B ## are both equal to ## B ##).
## \nabla (A \cdot B)=(A \cdot \nabla) B +(B \cdot \nabla) A+A \times \nabla \times B+B \times \nabla \times A ##
 
I have uploaded the page from Jackson it is equation (6.119) I am trying to prove, however I must use Levi Cevita notation.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4558.JPG
    IMG_4558.JPG
    67.7 KB · Views: 485
hellomynameisscottt said:
I have uploaded the page from Jackson it is equation (6.119) I am trying to prove, however I must use Levi Cevita notation.
On the left side of the equation in your OP, they are only taking one component. You may be able to use the identity I presented to simplify the ## B \times \nabla \times B ## term.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K