Proving Bijection Between X and Y: Tips & Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter estra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bijection
estra
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Prove that R ⊂ X x Y is a bijection between the sets X and Y, when R−1R= I: X→X and RR-1=I: Y→Y

Set theory is a quite a new lesson for me. So I am not good at proving different connections, but please give me a little help with what to start and so.. I have read the book and I know what bijection means but just..
I would be very very thankful. Getting a good example proof or just some tips what to do would improve my skills also I hope :)

Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you define R^{-1} without assuming R is a bijection (and thus has an inverse)?
 
I only know that if R ⊂ X x Y then R-1 ⊂ Y x X
or: (y,x)\inR-1 \Leftrightarrow (x,y) \in R
 
But that is undefined for specific y if there is no pair with that y in the second position.

And it is not uniquely defined if there is more than one pair with that y in the second position.
 
OK. Let's assume that R \subset X x Y is a bijection between X and Y.
Then we also have to have R-1. What is R-1 ⊂ Y x X
when i: X → X then (x,y)\inR has to be written (f(x),x) \in R and x \in X and also (f-1)y,y \in R and x \in X.
but how to show that R-1R=I abd RR-1=I ?
or do we have to write R={(x,x)| x\inR } R-1={(x,x)| x\in R} and
R={(y,y)| y\inR } R-1={(y,y)| y\inR }

please somebody help me here :)
Thank you!
 
OK. Let's assume that R \subset X x Y is a bijection between X and Y.
Then we also have to have R-1. What is R-1 ⊂ Y x X
when i: X → X then (x,y)\inR has to be written (f(x),x) \in R and x \in X and also (f-1)y,y \in R and x \in X.
but how to show that R-1R=I abd RR-1=I ?
or do we have to write R={(x,x)| x\inR } R-1={(x,x)| x\in R} and
R={(y,y)| y\inR } R-1={(y,y)| y\inR }

please somebody help me here :)
Thank you!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top