Proving covariant component is physical component times scaling factor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between covariant components and physical components of the gradient in polar and spherical coordinates, as outlined in "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences, 3rd Ed." The key conclusion is that the covariant components of the gradient, represented by the equation (10.5), are equal to the physical components multiplied by the corresponding scaling factors, as shown in equation (**). The participant questions whether this relationship is universally applicable to all vectors, not just gradients of scalar fields, highlighting a specific example that does not conform to this relationship.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of covariant and contravariant vectors
  • Familiarity with polar and spherical coordinate systems
  • Knowledge of gradient operations in vector calculus
  • Basic principles of differential geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of covariant and contravariant components in vector fields
  • Study the implications of scaling factors in different coordinate systems
  • Explore the application of the gradient operator in various contexts beyond scalar fields
  • Examine the relationship between physical and mathematical representations of vectors
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mathematics, and engineering who are studying vector calculus, particularly in the context of differential geometry and coordinate transformations.

Monsterman222
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




The problem is from Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences, 3rd Ed. Ch10, Sec. 10, Q4. My question is a bit subtle as I have actually figured out the problem, just that I don't understand my solution. The problem reads:

4) What are the physical components of the gradient in polar coordinates? [See (9.1)]. The partial derivatives in (10.5) are the covariant components of [itex]\nabla u[/itex]. What relation do you deduce between physical and covariant components? Answer the same questions for spherical coordinates, and for an orthogonal coordinate system with scale factors [itex]h_{1}, h_{2}, h_{3}[/itex].


Homework Equations



And we are given:

(9.1) [itex]\nabla u= \hat{e}_{r}\frac{\partial u}{\partial r} + \hat{e}_{\theta}\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial u}{\partial \theta} + \hat{e}_{z}\frac{\partial u}{\partial z}[/itex]

(10.5) [itex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial x'_{i}} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_{j}}\frac{\partial x_{j}}{\partial x'_{i}} = \frac{\partial x_{j}}{\partial x'_{i}}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_{j}}[/itex]

as well as the definition given in the book of a covariant vector:

(*) [itex]V'_{i} = \frac{\partial x_{j}}{\partial x'_{i}} V_{j}[/itex].

and

(**) [itex]\nabla u = \sum_{i=1}^{3} \hat{e}_{i} \frac{1}{h_{i}} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_{i}}.[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution



I found that the relationship in these situations is that the covariant components of [itex]\nabla u[/itex] are the physical components multiplied by the scaling factors. This is seen by looking at Eq. (**), for [itex]\hat{e}_{i}[/itex], the physical component is [itex]\frac{1}{h_{i}} \frac{\partial u}{\partial x_{i}}[/itex] and the covariant component is [itex]\frac{\partial u}{\partial x_{i}}[/itex].

My question is: Does this relationship hold for any vector and not just gradients of scalar fields? How do we know? For example, I could define a vector V to be

[tex]\vec V = \hat{e}_{r}\frac{\partial u}{\partial r} + \hat{e}_{\theta}\frac{\partial u}{\partial \theta} + \hat{e}_{\phi}\frac{1}{r sin(\theta)}\frac{\partial u}{\partial \phi}[/tex].

Notice the middle term on right hand side has no scaling factor (this is not a gradient, I just made it up). This vector seems not to obey the relation between the physical components and covariant components.


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds similar to me, I never understand my solutions; monkey see, monkey do.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
5K