Proving Divisibility by 9 with Modulo Notation

chimath35
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
An integer is divisible by 9 if and only if the sum of its digits is divisible by 9

Proof by induction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am new to proofs never done them, I am stuck ac=b 9c=b ex. 9c=81 so c is an int. thus divisible let b= d+dn so 9c=d+dn then 9c=d+dn+dn+9
 
In the decimal system, an integer with ##n## digits is written in the form
##\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}a_{k}10^{k}##, where the numbers ##a_{k}## are the digits.

Now consider the number
##\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}a_{k}10^{k}-\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}a_{k}##,
and deduce that it must always be divisible by 9. Then use the fact that if a sum of two integers, ##m+n## is divisible by 9 then either both ##m## and ##n## are divisible by 9 or neither of them is. That way you can prove the theorem.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
chimath35 said:
An integer is divisible by 9 if and only if the sum of its digits is divisible by 9

Proof by induction?

Have you worked with modulo notation? Easiest way is to reduce the decimal representation ##\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}a_{k}10^{k} \pmod{9}## where the digits ##0 \leq a_k \leq 9## and make the observation that ##10 \equiv 1 \pmod{9}##. The rest should quickly follow, but if you get stuck, post back.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Curious3141 said:
Have you worked with modulo notation? Easiest way is to reduce the decimal representation ##\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}a_{k}10^{k} \pmod{9}## where the digits ##0 \leq a_k \leq 9## and make the observation that ##10 \equiv 1 \pmod{9}##. The rest should quickly follow, but if you get stuck, post back.

This is a great hint. Using this method, you can actually prove a stronger statement:

## a \equiv (\sum a_k) \ (\text{mod } 9) ##

where ##a_k## are the digits of ##a##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top