Proving e^2: Lim x --> 0 (1+2x)^(1/x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter jerometurner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that the limit as x approaches 0 of (1 + 2x)^(1/x) equals e^2, which falls under the subject area of limits and exponential functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss taking the natural logarithm of both sides and applying L'Hôpital's Rule to evaluate the limit. There is also mention of changing variables to simplify the limit, with different suggestions on substitutions being explored.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing various approaches and questioning the effectiveness of their methods. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of L'Hôpital's Rule and the continuity of logarithmic functions, but no consensus has been reached on a single method.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about their approaches and the implications of their substitutions. There is a concern about receiving too much help and the importance of developing personal understanding in problem-solving.

jerometurner
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that lim x ---> 0 (1 + 2x)^(1/x) = e^2




The Attempt at a Solution



lim x --> 0 log (1 + 2x)^(1/x) = 1
lim x --> 0 log (1 + 2x)/x = 1

Not really sure if I'm headed in the right direction here. Extremely new to proofs, thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let y = (1 + 2x)1/x

Then take the natural log of both sides.
Then take the limit as x --> 0 of both sides.

The limit you'll be working with is indeterminate, of the form [0/0], so you can use L'Hopital's Rule to evaluate it.

At this point you have [tex]lim_{x \to 0} ln y = <\text{some number}>[/tex].

If a function is continuous, lim (ln f(x)) = ln( lim f(x)), meaning that you can interchange the operations of limit and ln.

You'll have ln(lim f(x)) = k, so lim f(x) = ek.
 
thank you very much, I think I'm on the right track as l'hopital's rule is giving me 2 which is ln e^2...
 
A simple change of variable turns this problem into a familiar limit...
 
BTW when you receive too much help -- e.g. how Mark44 pretty much told you every little thing to do -- you should ignore it if possible (and report it), or set it aside and try to reproduce the outline on your own.

If you do wind up using the solution he gave you, you should spend some time studying the problem, trying to answer the question: "How would I have figured out this approach to the problem?" and/or "What could I have done to finish the problem the way I was thinking about it?"
 
Is the substitution you're talking about something like letting x = 1/y?
 
I was thinking 1/(2y), but if 1/y is also something familiar, so that works too.

P.S. I mentioned it not because you should do it my way, but just to show you another way to do it. It's good to know lots of ways to do things! (And a lot of people seem not to think about limits by substitution. :frown:)
 
I know what you mean... Thanks both of you for your suggestions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K