Proving Equality of Image and Eigenspace for Eigenvalue 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter chrisb93
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
chrisb93
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


It's given or I've already shown in previous parts of the question:
A \in M_{nxn}(F)\\<br /> A^{2}=I_{n}\\<br /> F = \mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{R} or \mathbb{C}\\<br /> ker(L_{I_{n}+A})=E_{-1}(A)
Eigenvalues of A must be \pm1

Show im(L_{I_{n}+A})=E_{1}(A) where E is the eigenspace for the eigenvalue 1

(I also need to show that im(L_{I_{n}-A})=E_{-1}(A) but I think that should be simple once I've done one of them)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I know that I need to show both sets are contained within the other set so,

Show im(L_{I_{n}+A}) \subseteq E_{1}(A)
y=L_{I_{n}+A}(x) Let y be a general element of the image
=x+Ax By definition of the transformation
\Rightarrow A y = A x + A^{2} x Multiply through by A
= A x + x As A2 is the identity element
\Rightarrow A y = y \in E_{1}(A) As E_{1}(A) := \{ x | A x = x \}

I've no idea how to show E_{1}(A) \subseteq im(L_{I_{n}+A})
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't seem to have defined "L_{I_n+ A}" in all that.
 
HallsofIvy said:
You don't seem to have defined "L_{I_n+ A}" in all that.

It's never specifically defined in the question but I believe the subscript is the matrix representing the map so L(x) = (I_{n} + A)x
 
Take an eigenvector with eigenvalue 1. So Ay=y.

You need to find x such that (A+I)x=y.

What if you take x=y??
 
micromass said:
Take an eigenvector with eigenvalue 1. So Ay=y.

You need to find x such that (A+I)x=y.

What if you take x=y??

I don't see how that works, if x=y then Ax=x therefore (A+I)x=Ax+x=2x=y which contradicts itself.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top