Proving Equivalence of Rational Number Statements

  • Thread starter Thread starter ArtyJay9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
ArtyJay9
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Show that these statement about real number x are equivalent
(i) x is rational
(ii) x/2 is rational
(iii)3x-1is rational

i think you have to use contradiction but i don't know how
 
Physics news on Phys.org
x is rational if and only if you can write it in the form p/q for p, q integers (and q non-zero). So if x is rational, let x=p/q. Can you find integers m and n such that x/2=m/n? You can do this exact process to show that 1 implies 2, 2 implies 3, and 3 implies 1 (which gives that they are equivalent)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top