Proving Existence of Zero with Least Upper Bounds

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 1K views
andilus
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



sup problem
if f is continuous on [a,b] with f(a)<0<f(b), show that there is a largest x in [a,b] with f(x)=0

Homework Equations

i think it can be done by least upper bounds, but i dun know wat is the exact prove.

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by showing that there is one x in [a,b] such that f(x) = 0. Then form the set
[tex]S = \{x \in [a,b] | f(x) = 0\}[/tex]
You have already shown that S is non-empty and you know that it's bounded, so it must have a supremum. Let
[tex]x_0 = \sup\,S[/tex]
Since [itex]x_0[/itex] is an upper bound for S, if we can show [itex]x_0 \in S[/itex] we have shown that it's the largest element in S. So all you need to do is show [itex]x_0 \in S[/itex]. The easiest way to do this is to assume [itex]x_0 \notin S[/itex], i.e. [itex]y_0 = f(x_0) \not= 0[/itex]. Now since f is continuous at [itex]x_0[/itex] we can find some [itex]\delta > 0[/itex] such that if [itex]x \in (x_0-\delta,x_0 + \delta)[/itex] then [itex]f(x) \in (0,2y_0)[/itex] (let [itex]\epsilon = |y_0|[/itex]). Now [itex]x_0 - \delta[/itex] is an upper-bound for S, but less than [itex]x_0[/itex].
 
but how to prove x0 is in [a,b]?
 
i seem to know...
if x0<a, obviously wrong.
if x0>b, we can find some x such that b-[tex]\delta[/tex]<x<b satisfying that x is upper bound of the set.