Proving function is improper riemann integrable

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pietjuh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Riemann
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function f(x) = sin(x)/x for x > 0 and f(0) = c is proven to be improper Riemann integrable on the interval [0, ∞). The discussion highlights the necessity of demonstrating that the positive and negative parts of the integral can partially cancel each other to achieve convergence. The Cauchy criterion is identified as a key method for establishing the convergence of the improper integral, and integration by parts is suggested as a technique to bound the integral effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of improper integrals and their convergence criteria
  • Familiarity with the Cauchy criterion for integrals
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, particularly integration by parts
  • Basic concepts of Lebesgue measurability
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Cauchy criterion for improper integrals in detail
  • Learn about integration by parts and its applications in bounding integrals
  • Explore Lebesgue integration and its convergence theorems
  • Investigate the behavior of oscillatory functions in improper integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and researchers focusing on real analysis, particularly those studying improper integrals and convergence criteria.

Pietjuh
Messages
75
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



let f:[0,oo) -> R be given by f(x) = sin(x) / x for x>0 and f(0) = c. Prove that f is improper riemann integrable without computing the integral explicitly

The Attempt at a Solution



I've attempted to find a upperbound for f(x) such that the integral does not diverge. The most simple one is to use the fact that sin(x) <= 1 for all x, but this gives a divergent integral.

I've already proved that f is Lebesgue measurable for every c in R. So I could turn the integral [tex]\int_0^R f(x) dx[/tex] into a Lebesgue integral and then use one of the convergence theorems to try to show with them that the integral does not diverge. But I haven't succeded in doing this :(

Can anyone help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you've probably noticed, the integral of the absolute value of your function diverges. The fact an improper integral can be defined means you must be able to show that the positive parts can be combined with the negative parts to get a partial cancellation that can converge. Draw a graph and think about estimating. Does that help?
 
Hoi Piet.

Use the Cauchy criterion!:
The improper integral [tex]\int_a^\infty f(x)dx[/tex] converges if and only if [itex]\forall \epsilon>0 \exists b>a[/itex] such that
[tex]c,d > b \Rightarrow \left|\int_c^d f(x)dx \right| < \epsilon[/tex]

----
You can use integration by parts to show that:
[tex]\left| \int_c^d \frac{\sin x}{x}dx\right|\leq 2\left(\frac{1}{c}+\frac{1}{d}\right)[/tex]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K