Proving general solution of Helmholtz equation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
physicslove2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that F(k•r -ωt) is a solution of the Helmholtz equation, provided that ω/k = 1/(µε)1/2, where k = (kx, ky, kz) is the wave-vector and r is the position vector. In F(k•r -ωt), “k•r –ωt” is the argument and F is any vector function.

Homework Equations


Helmholtz Equation: ∇2A+k2A=0

The Attempt at a Solution


I first completed the dot of k and r thus,
F(xkx+ yky+zkz)I am a little confused at this point, if I plug it into the equation I don't see how it would be 0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
SteamKing said:
It's not clear what you've done, since you haven't shown your work.

I completed the dot between k and r within F.

k = (kx, ky, kz)
TA said to use r=(x,y,z)

thus the function becomes
F(xkx+ yky+zkz)

2F(xkx+ yky+zkz)=0, right?but then how would k2F(xkx+ yky+zkz)=0?
 
2F(xkx+ yky+zkz)=0 is not right. Because then, as you say, you would need k2F=0, which is the trivial solution.

It is a kind of weird problem in the first place, since the Helmholtz equation does not care about time dependence. Are you sure the problem wasn't to show that ##F(k\cdot r -\omega t)## is a solution of the wave equation, and to go on to prove that it is also a solution of the Helmholtz equation?