Proving Hermitian Operators: (A+B)^n Remains Hermitian | Step-by-Step Guide

rbnphlp
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
If A and B are hermitia operators , then prove (A+B)^n is also hermitian.

Justw ondering if this would suffice ?

∫ ψ^*(A+B) ∅ dt= ∫((A+B) ψ)^* ∅ dt assuming (A+B) is hermitian

I can do that again
∫ ψ^*(A+B) ∅ dt= ∫((A+B) ψ)^* ∅ dt

multiply them together
∫((A+B) ψ)^(2*) ∅^2 dt

and we contine to multiplying till n aand theyre stil hermitian .

what do you guys think ? should I do soemthing else
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think your multiplication of integrals has been done correctrly as you should use a new variable of integration for every integral you multiply. However, you can firstly see that if an operatore C is hermitian then C^n is hermitian. In fact, if you consider a scalar product (\cdot,\cdot):

$$(x,Cy)=(Cx,y)\Rightarrow (x,C^2y)=(Cx,Cy)=(C^2x,y)$$

and you can repeat the same thing n times.
So if A and B are hermitian then:

$$(x,(A+B)y)=(x,Ay)+(x,By)=(Ax,y)+(Bx,y)=((A+B)x,y)$$

If you call A+B=C then you have your proof.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top