Proving Hermitian Operators: (A+B)^n Remains Hermitian | Step-by-Step Guide

rbnphlp
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
If A and B are hermitia operators , then prove (A+B)^n is also hermitian.

Justw ondering if this would suffice ?

∫ ψ^*(A+B) ∅ dt= ∫((A+B) ψ)^* ∅ dt assuming (A+B) is hermitian

I can do that again
∫ ψ^*(A+B) ∅ dt= ∫((A+B) ψ)^* ∅ dt

multiply them together
∫((A+B) ψ)^(2*) ∅^2 dt

and we contine to multiplying till n aand theyre stil hermitian .

what do you guys think ? should I do soemthing else
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think your multiplication of integrals has been done correctrly as you should use a new variable of integration for every integral you multiply. However, you can firstly see that if an operatore C is hermitian then C^n is hermitian. In fact, if you consider a scalar product (\cdot,\cdot):

$$(x,Cy)=(Cx,y)\Rightarrow (x,C^2y)=(Cx,Cy)=(C^2x,y)$$

and you can repeat the same thing n times.
So if A and B are hermitian then:

$$(x,(A+B)y)=(x,Ay)+(x,By)=(Ax,y)+(Bx,y)=((A+B)x,y)$$

If you call A+B=C then you have your proof.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top