Proving Inductive Step: P(k) to P(k+1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chromium
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the inductive step for the formula P(n): 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n-1) = n^2. The base case P(1) is established as true, confirming that 1 = 1^2. For the inductive step, P(k) is assumed to be true, leading to the expression for P(k + 1) as 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2k-1) + (2(k+1)-1). The proof shows that this simplifies to (k + 1)^2, confirming the inductive hypothesis. The discussion also raises questions about the variability of the inductive step across different problems, emphasizing the need for clarity in proving each case.
Chromium
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
P(n): 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n-1) = n^2

Prove P(1)
P(1) = 1 = 1^2
P(1) is true

(A) P(k): 1 + 3 + 5 +...+ (2k-1) = k^2

(B) P(k + 1): 1 + 3 + 5 +...+ (2k-1) + (2(k+1)-1)
or
(2k-1) + (2k + 1) = (k+1)^2

Assuming A, prove B

(2k-1) = k^2
(2(k+1)-1) = (k+1)(k+1)
(2k + 1) = (k^2 + 2k+ 2)
= (k+1)^2

When in comes to the inductive step, does it "differ" from problem to problem? I can always get to the inductive assumption, but then I'm never sure just how to go about proving it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chromium said:
P(n): 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n-1) = n^2

Prove P(1)
P(1) = 1 = 1^2
P(1) is true

(A) P(k): 1 + 3 + 5 +...+ (2k-1) = k^2

(B) P(k + 1): 1 + 3 + 5 +...+ (2k-1) + (2(k+1)-1)
or
(2k-1) + (2k + 1) = (k+1)^2
I'm, sorry? how does 1+ 3+ ...+ 2(k+1)= (2k-1)+ 2k?

Assuming A, prove B

(2k-1) = k^2
(2(k+1)-1) = (k+1)(k+1)
(2k + 1) = (k^2 + 2k+ 2)
= (k+1)^2

When in comes to the inductive step, does it "differ" from problem to problem? I can always get to the inductive assumption, but then I'm never sure just how to go about proving it.
You want to prove that "P(k)= (k+1)^2. P(k+1)= P(k)+ 2k+1 for every k. The "induction hypothesis" is that P(k-1)= k^2 . From that, P(k+1)= P(k)+ k+1= k^2+ 2k+ 1= (k+1)^2/
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top