MHB Proving inequality using Mean Value Theorem

Click For Summary
To prove the inequality g(x) ≤ x^(-2/3) for all x > 0, the Mean Value Theorem should be applied to the function f instead of h. By establishing that f is continuous and differentiable on the appropriate intervals, one can find a point c in (x, x+3) where g(x) equals 3f'(c). Given that f'(c) is expressed as (1/3)c^(-2/3), it follows that g(x) = c^(-2/3). Since c is greater than x, it leads to the conclusion that g(x) ≤ x^(-2/3) for all positive x.
Samme013
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
View attachment 3373

Need help with this exercise been stuck on it for a while i think i get the gist of what i am supposed to do but can't seem to get it to work i am definitely missing something. I set h(x)= x-2/3 - g(x) and tried using the mean value theorem on [a,b] and then tried finding the minimum value of h'(x) in order to find a relation between h(a),h(b) but an't seem to get the given answer. Thanks in advance , really need to get the exercise done
 

Attachments

  • TIbFuOK.png
    TIbFuOK.png
    9 KB · Views: 109
Physics news on Phys.org
Samme013 said:
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/3373

Need help with this exercise been stuck on it for a while i think i get the gist of what i am supposed to do but can't seem to get it to work i am definitely missing something. I set h(x)= x-2/3 - g(x) and tried using the mean value theorem on [a,b] and then tried finding the minimum value of h'(x) in order to find a relation between h(a),h(b) but an't seem to get the given answer. Thanks in advance , really need to get the exercise done

Hi Samme013,

To prove that the inequality $g(x) \le x^{-2/3}$ is valid for all $x > 0$, apply the mean value theorem to $f$, not $h$. Namely, fix $x > 0$. Since $f$ is continuous on $[x, x+3]$ and differentiable on $(x, x+3)$, the mean value theorem gives a $c\in (x, x+3)$ such that $f(x + 3) - f(x) = f'(c)((x + 3) - 3)$, or $g(x) = 3f'(c)$. Since $f'(c) = \frac{1}{3}c^{-2/3}$, $g(x) = c^{-2/3}$. Since $c > x$, $c^{-2/3} \le x^{-2/3}$. Therefore $g(x) \le x^{-2/3}$. Since $x$ was an arbitrary positive number, $g(x) \le x^{-2/3}$ for all $x > 0$.
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K