Proving Kirchoff's Laws algebraically

  • Thread starter Thread starter shyguy79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving Kirchhoff's Laws algebraically, specifically demonstrating that VAB equals VAD and that i1 equals i/2. Participants share their attempts at algebraic manipulation and calculations using hypothetical values, expressing confusion about the relationships between voltages and currents. Key insights include applying Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to derive equations for the circuit, emphasizing the importance of current direction in determining voltage signs. The conversation highlights the necessity of careful algebraic steps to arrive at the desired proofs. Overall, the participants gain clarity on the application of Kirchhoff's Laws through collaborative problem-solving.
shyguy79
Messages
99
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


From the attached file using Kirchoff's laws prove that V AB = V AD and that i1 = i/2

Homework Equations


V1 + V2 + V3 +... Vn = 0 (The sum of the voltage applied and dropped across the components is zero.
i1 + i2 = i3 (The sum of the branch currents is equal to the total current)

The Attempt at a Solution


I thought I was ok with algebraic manipulation but this has stumped me :-( any pointers would be appreciated as always!
 

Attachments

  • Circuit-Series-Parallel.jpg
    Circuit-Series-Parallel.jpg
    8.9 KB · Views: 463
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you get when you tried to apply Kirchoff's laws to the circuit?
 
Hi, as there are no figures given it looks like I'm expected to do prove everything using algebra...

I've calculated hypothetic values - say V = 12v, R total = 16Ω and i total = 0.75A and everything seems to add up but I'm afraid my algebra manipulation skills are somewhat limited.

For example I've tried that if: V ab = V ad and i1 = i - i2 and i2 = i -i1 (Kirchoffs 2nd Law) then i1 R0 = i2 R0 but don't know where to go now
 
You can't assume VAB=VAD because that's what you're trying to prove.

Applying KCL to node A gives you ##i = i_1 + i_2 ##. I'm assuming all currents are flowing left to right. What do you get if you apply it to nodes B, C, and D?
 
B: i3 = i1
C: i = i3 + i4
D: i4 = i2
 
Great! So we can eliminate i3 and i4 because we know they're equal to i1 and i2 respectively, and the equation for node C tells us the same thing as the equation for node A.

Now apply KVL to the loop ABCDA. What do you get?
 
VT - i1R0 - i1R0 - i2R0 - i2R0 = 0
VT = VAB + VBC + VDC + VAD
VT = R0 (i1+i1+i2+i2)
VT = R0 (2i1 + 2i2)

But I don't understand how V AB can be described as V AD

or even

VT = VAB + VBC + VDC + VAD
 
Last edited:
shyguy79 said:
VT - i1R0 - i1R0 - i2R0 - i2R0 = 0
This isn't quite right. Across the four resistors, Ohm's Law tells us the potential differences are

VAB=i1R0
VBC=i1R0
VAD=i2R0
VDC=i2R0

where the higher potential is at the left end of each resistor (where the current enters). So starting at A and going clockwise around the loop, we first encounter a voltage drop VAB and then another drop VBC, but going from C to D, the potential increases by VDC because we are going from right to left, and again from D to A by VAD. So KVL gives us

- VAB - VBC + VDC + VAD = 0

Note that VT doesn't enter into the picture because the battery is not part of the loop ABCDA. So plugging in the values above, you get

-i1R0-i1R0+i2R0-i2R0=0
 
Oh, I see! So the direction of flow has a direct effect on the sign of the variable! Cool, there are a few more questions in this assignment but I think I understand.

Thank you for all your help!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top