Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around proving that a function \( v \) defined on a translated domain \( \Omega_{(a,b)} \) satisfies the Laplace equation, given that a function \( u \) satisfies the same equation in the original domain \( \Omega \). Participants explore the application of the chain rule and the continuity of derivatives in this context.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Mathematical reasoning
- Homework-related
Main Points Raised
- Some participants propose that since \( v \) is the composition of \( u \) with a translation map, and \( u \) is \( C^2 \), then \( v \) must also be \( C^2 \) in \( \Omega_{(a,b)} \).
- There is a suggestion to use the chain rule to show that \( \frac{\partial^2 v}{\partial X^2} + \frac{\partial^2 v}{\partial Y^2} = 0 \) follows from \( \Delta u = 0 \).
- One participant questions whether it is necessary to show that \( v \) has continuous derivatives to establish that \( v \in C^2(\Omega_{(a,b)}) \).
- Another participant asserts that \( v \) being the composition of \( C^2 \) maps guarantees its \( C^2 \) nature.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree on the application of the chain rule and the composition of \( C^2 \) functions, but there is some uncertainty regarding the necessity of demonstrating the continuity of derivatives for \( v \).
Contextual Notes
Limitations include the lack of explicit demonstration of continuous derivatives for \( v \) and the dependence on the definitions of \( C^2 \) functions.