Proving Limits: Understanding the Role of Epsilon in Limit Proofs

  • Thread starter Thread starter transgalactic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
the question and where i got stuck in this link:

http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/8868/44429492ix7.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a proof that limit, as x goes to 5 of x2= 25. For that you must have |x^2- 25|< \epsilon which leads to |(x- 5)(x+ 5)|< \epsilon
Since you want something of the form |x- 5|&lt; \delta, is is the "x+ 5" term you want to deal with. You cannot write |x- 5|&lt; \epsilon/(x+5) because the right side cannot depend on x. What you can do is find an upper bound: if |x+5|< M, then 1/|x+5|> 1/M so \epsilon/|x+5|&gt; \epsilon/M. If, then |x-5|&lt; \epsilon/M which is itself less than \epsilon/|x+5| it is certainly less than \epsilon/(x+5)

What is an upper bound on |x+5|? First you must understand that there are an infinite number of such "upper bounds". If a is an upper bound then any number larger than a is still an upperbound. We want x close to 5. Just because "1" is an easy number, let's try |x-5|< 1. That says that -1< x- 5< 1 and, adding 10 to each part 9< x+5< 11. Since 9< x+ 5, it is obviously positive so |x+5|= x+ 5< 11. I chose "10" to add, of course, because x-5+ 10= x+ 5.

That's where those numbers come from. We could as easily have decided that |x-5|< 2 is "close enough". Then we would have -2< x- 5< 2 and so, adding 10 again, 8< x+ 5< 12 and now we "12" as an upper bound on |x+5| rather than 11.

Or we could decide we wanted to be |x-5|< 1/2. -1/2< x- 5< 1/2. Again adding 10, 9.5< x+ 5< 10.5 so that 10.5 is an upper bound. In fact, any number greater than 10 could be used as an upper bound.
 
Thanks i understand that
 
i understand that our upper bound is 11

so inorder for this to work we need only
\delta = \frac{\epsilon }{11} <br />

why to use minimum??

why they are taking the solution as the minimal between 1 and the other value??\delta =\min \left\{ 1,\frac{\epsilon }{11} \right\}.\quad\blacksquare<br />
 
We have shown that in order that |x- L|< \epsilon, we must have |x- a|, \epsilon/11. But in order to have that we must have |x-a|<1. That is, they must both be true.

If |x-a| is less than the smaller of the two, it is less than both.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top