Proving: $(\ln{x})^n$ Integral from 0 to 1

  • Thread starter Thread starter v0id19
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
15 replies · 3K views
v0id19
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If n is a positive integer, prove that [tex]\int_{0}^{1}(\ln{x})^ndx=(-1)^n\cdot n![/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm assuming that since ln(0) is undef and [tex]\mathop{\lim}\limits_{x \to 0^+}\ln{x}=- \infty[/tex] i need to rewrite the integral as [tex]\mathop{\lim}\limits_{t \to 0^+}\int_{t}^{1}(\ln{x})^ndx=(-1)^n\cdot n![/tex]. But I have no idea how to integrate that since n is a variable...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so i proved n=1, and assumed it's true for n=k
now for n=k+1, I get:
[tex]\mathop{\lim}\limits_{t \to 0^+}\int_{t}^{1}[/tex]ln(x)(k+1)dx which i need to prove equals [tex](-1)^k^+^1\cdot (k+1)![/tex] Now i know that ln(x)k+1=ln(x)kln(x).

so if i integrate by parts using f=ln(x)k and g'=ln(x), i go around in circles...

am i missing something?
 
i'm not familiar with that notation for integration by parts, but if i understand you correctly g*df=[tex]\frac{\ln{x}^k \cdot (k+1)}{x} \cdot 1[/tex]
 
so then i get
ln(x)k+1*x-∫ln(x)k(k+1)dx
 
g=x. So I get x*(k+1)*ln(x)^k*(1/x) dx. Do you see how the x's cancel? I was trying to imitate your notation for integration by parts. Integral(f*dg)=f*g-Integral(g*df).
 
can i do that with the (k+1) inside the integral?
or do i do parts again, and set
f'=ln(x)^k f=(-1)kk!
g=k+1 g'=0

that gets me
ln(x)k+1*x-[((-1)kk!)(k+1)]+∫0dx
 
Physicists don't like proofs by induction.

[tex]\int_{0}^{1}x^{p}dx = \frac{1}{p+1}[/tex]

Differentiate both sides n times w.r.t. the parameter p:

[tex]\int_{0}^{1}x^{p} \log^{n}(x)dx = (-1)^{n}\frac{n!}{(p+1)^{n+1}}[/tex]

Put p = 0 to get the desired result.
 
Dick said:
(k+1) IS a CONSTANT.

oh duh thanks
 
so i have ln(x)k+1x-(k+1)(-1)kk!
which equals
ln(x)k+1x-(-1)k(k+1)!

so somehow ln(x)k+1x needs to get my (-1)k to (-1)k+1
 
Count Iblis said:
Physicists don't like proofs by induction.

[tex]\int_{0}^{1}x^{p}dx = \frac{1}{p+1}[/tex]

Differentiate both sides n times w.r.t. the parameter p:

[tex]\int_{0}^{1}x^{p} \log^{n}(x)dx = (-1)^{n}\frac{n!}{(p+1)^{n+1}}[/tex]

Put p = 0 to get the desired result.

I'm a physicist, and I don't have any particular problems with induction. But sure, you can do it that way. Note the problem says 'prove that'. Physicists also HATE proofs.
 
v0id19 said:
so i have ln(x)k+1x-(k+1)(-1)kk!
which equals
ln(x)k+1x-(-1)k(k+1)!

so somehow ln(x)k+1x needs to get my (-1)k to (-1)k+1

(-1)*(-1)^k=(-1)^(k+1), doesn't it? The term x*ln(x)^(k+1) vanishes at x=1. And it's limit is 0 as x->0. You can use l'Hopital and another induction argument to show that, if you don't already know it.
 
yeah if i just show the l'hopital for the t-->0 that should be sufficient.

THANKS! :D :D