Proving N C R x M C R-r = (N+M) C R

  • Thread starter Thread starter the4thamigo_uk
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the combinatorial identity E (N, r) x (M, R-r) = (N+M, R) for selecting R objects from two sets of N and M objects. Participants explore the possibility of using an inductive proof, acknowledging the complexity due to three variables. A combinatorial interpretation is suggested, where the selection of R balls from two bins is analyzed. The conversation includes a breakdown of how to combine terms from the binomial expansions of both sets to match the desired equation. Ultimately, the participants aim to establish a formal proof of the identity through combinatorial reasoning.
the4thamigo_uk
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If (N,R) indicates number of combinations of R objects selected from set of N objects N >=r then prove :

R
E (N,r) x (M,R-r) = (N+M, R)
r=0

E specifies the usual capital sigma notion for a sum.

The Attempt at a Solution



Just don't know how to tackle this? Inductive proof may be possible but we have three variables N, M and R, so its non trivial?

Any clues?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hola the4thamigo_uk! :smile:

Suppose we have 2 bins with respectively N balls and M balls, and we take a total of R balls from both bins.
What are the possibilities for the number of balls to take from the first bin?
And how do they combine with the balls from the second bin?
 
Yes I understand the situation and the combinatoric proof, but how would I formally prove it?
 
Hmm, let's see...

Suppose we take generic variables a and b, then:
(a+b)N+M = (a+b)N (a+b)M

Working this out you get:
(... + C(N+M,R) aR bN+M-R + ... ) = (C(N,0)a0 bN + C(N,1)a1 bN-1 + ...) (C(M,0)a0 bM + C(M,1)a1 bM-1 + ...)

To get the specific term on the left side, you need to combine the terms on the right side in such a way that corresponds exactly to your equation.
So the equation must hold true.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top