Proving Non-Cyclic and Non-Abelian Properties of Dihedral and Symmetric Groups?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the symmetric group S_n and the dihedral group D_n for n≥3 are non-cyclic and non-abelian. Participants are exploring the properties of these groups in the context of group theory.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to demonstrate that certain elements within the groups do not commute and question how to generalize findings for all n≥3. There is also exploration of the cyclic nature of the groups and how rotations and reflections relate to this property.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and examples related to the non-abelian property of the groups. Some participants suggest that proving non-abelian properties will inherently show that the groups are non-cyclic, while others are seeking clarification on how to generalize specific examples to all n.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the depth of exploration into the proofs. There is an emphasis on finding specific elements within the groups to demonstrate the required properties.

MikeDietrich
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that S_n and D_n for n>=3 are non-cyclic and non-abelian.


Homework Equations


I get that I need to show that two elements from each group do not commute and that there is not a single generator to produce the groups... I am just unsure of how to do this.



The Attempt at a Solution


I can prove the non-abelian part for both by "multiplying" two of the elements and showing they do not commute (easy enough). However, how do I generalize the property to all n>=3? I have no idea where to start with the cyclic part. I have a hard time visualizing how rotations and reflections could be cyclic.

Any guidance appreciated. I generally find someone says one little thing that makes everything click into place. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, it suffices to show that the groups are not abelian. This implies that the groups are not cyclic (since any cyclic group is abelian).

Let's start of with Sn. You need to find two elements in Sn which do not commute. Can you find me such elements in S3??
 
Sure. r = rotation, s = refection
Let's say r_1=3, r_2=1, r_3 = 2 and s_1 = 2, s_2 = 1 and s_3 = 3 then (r)(s) = (1,3,2) and (s)(r) = (3,2,1). Obviously, they do not commute. How do I generalize that to include all n>=3?
 
Well, I think this example generalizes to all n... It will never be true that rs=sr.
 
Yeah... you're right. I was over-thinking this one. THANKS!
 
Is is enough to show Dn is non-abelian as it is a subgroup of Sn. This follows directly from a definition (note s-1 = s)

[URL]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/0/5/6/056d32f591f128306e785abf0b1437c7.png[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K