Proving Open Sets and Open Balls in Normed Spaces

  • Thread starter Thread starter sigh1342
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Set
sigh1342
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

Show that S is open if and only if ∀x ∈ S, ∃ a open ball B(x; r)(r > 0) such that B(x; r) ⊂ S
And what we have is , let X be normed space, S ⊂X , Then S is close if and only if $$∀{x_{n}}⊂X, s.t. x_{n}->x \in X$$, x∈ S. A set S is open if and only if X\S is close.


The attempt at a solution
I try to use following approach.
"=>" since S is open, there exist some sequence s.t. its limit is not in S(otherwise X/S is not close), then for any x, we can construct the convergent sequence such that its limit is not in S.(I don't know it is true or not). So by the limit definition. ∃ a open ball B(x; r)(r > 0) such that B(x; r) ⊂ S.

"<=" I try to prove X\S is close, so that X is open. $$∀{x_{n}}⊂X, s.t. x_{n}->x \in X$$ , x should be in X\S, but I have no idea to prove it.um.. Can anyone give me some ideas? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sigh1342 said:
Homework Statement

Show that S is open if and only if ∀x ∈ S, ∃ a open ball B(x; r)(r > 0) such that B(x; r) ⊂ S
And what we have is , let X be normed space, S ⊂X , Then S is close if and only if $$∀{x_{n}}⊂X, s.t. x_{n}->x \in X$$, x∈ S. A set S is open if and only if X\S is close.


The attempt at a solution
I try to use following approach.
"=>" since S is open, there exist some sequence s.t. its limit is not in S(otherwise X/S is not close), then for any x, we can construct the convergent sequence such that its limit is not in S.(I don't know it is true or not).

I'm not sure this even makes sense.

I would prove this by contrapositive: Assume that there exists an x \in S such that for all r &gt; 0, B(x,r) \not\subset S, and show that it follows that X \setminus S is not closed.

"<=" I try to prove X\S is close, so that X is open. $$∀{x_{n}}⊂X, s.t. x_{n}->x \in X$$ , x should be in X\S, but I have no idea to prove it.um.. Can anyone give me some ideas? :)

Your assumption is that for all x \in S there exists r &gt; 0 such that B(x,r) \subset S. Why does it follow that x \in S cannot be the limit of any sequence in X \setminus S?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top