Proving Pascal's Formula for Combinations: Using Pascal's Triangle and Formula

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elruso
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving Pascal's formula for combinations, specifically the equation that sums combinations from k to n. Participants clarify the notation and emphasize the need to use Pascal's triangle and mathematical induction for the proof. The proof involves three steps: establishing a base case, assuming the formula holds for a specific n, and proving it for n + 1. There is some confusion about the problem's wording, but the main approach remains centered on induction. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding the combinatorial identities involved in the proof.
Elruso
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Prove "Pascals formula"

Homework Statement


Show that (k)+(k+1)+...+(n) = (n+1) it's supposed to be combinations
(k) (k ) (k) (k+1)

That's the question in my math book. I guess you need to use Pascals triangle and Pascals formula but unfortionately I don't know how to implement them here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
please define what are these notations
what is the meaning of (k) ?
 
lalbatros, he means show that:

{{k}\choose{k}} + {{k+1}\choose{k}} + \dots + {{n}\choose{k}} = {{n+1}\choose{k+1}}

The second line of (k)'s and the (k+1) is supposed to line up underneath the stuff on the previous line. I'm about to hit the space bar 10 times. I just hit it 10 times, I see a big gap between "times." and "I just" but when I post this message, you'll only see one space.

Elruso, use Pascal's triangle on the right side of your equation together with induction.
 
Well, n=1,2,3,4... and k=1,2,3,4...
 
Elruso said:
Well, n=1,2,3,4... and k=1,2,3,4...
I don't know what your point is. Do induction on n. The base case is the trivial fact that {{k}\choose{k}} = {{k+1}\choose{k+1}}.
 
Elruso said:

Homework Statement


Show that (k)+(k+1)+...+(n) = (n+1) it's supposed to be combinations
(k) (k ) (k) (k+1)

That's the question in my math book. I guess you need to use Pascals triangle and Pascals formula but unfortionately I don't know how to implement them here.

Are you sure the problem is copied correctly? I think I should have read:
\left( \begin{array}{c} k \\ k \end{array} \right) + \left( \begin{array}{c} k + 1 \\ k \end{array} \right) + \left( \begin{array}{c} k + 2 \\ k \end{array} \right) + ... + \left( \begin{array}{c} k + n \\ k \end{array} \right) = \left( \begin{array}{c} k + n + 1 \\ k + 1 \end{array} \right)

As AKG's pointed out, you need a Proof By Induction. Proof By Induction requires 3 steps, i.e:
Step 1: Start with n = 0, or 1, or 2, or whatever according to what the problem asks you to do (in this case, you should choose n = 0), to see if it's correct.
Step 2: Assume the statement is true for k = n.
Step 3: prove that if it holds true for k = n, then it would also hold true for k = n + 1.

Can you go from her? :)
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Back
Top