Proving Positivity of a Recursively Defined Sequence using Induction

  • Thread starter Thread starter nugget
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the positivity of a recursively defined sequence \( x_n \) defined by \( x_1 = 2 \) and \( x_{n+1} = \frac{8x_n - 1}{4x_n + 3} \) for \( n \in \mathbb{N} \). The initial case \( x_1 - 1 > 0 \) is established, confirming that \( x_1 = 2 \) satisfies the condition. The inductive proof requires demonstrating that if \( x_n > 1 \), then \( x_{n+1} > 1 \) holds true for all \( n \in \mathbb{N}.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with recursively defined sequences
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of inequalities and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in detail
  • Explore examples of recursively defined sequences
  • Learn about the properties of inequalities in sequences
  • Practice proving statements using induction with various examples
USEFUL FOR

Students studying discrete mathematics, mathematicians interested in sequence analysis, and educators teaching mathematical induction techniques.

nugget
Messages
44
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A sequence xn is defined recursively by x1 = 2 and xn+1 = 8xn-1/4xn+3 for n ∈ N.
a. Prove by induction or otherwise that xn -1 > 0 for all n ∈ N.

Homework Equations



given...

The Attempt at a Solution



x1 is given as 2, therefore x1 - 1 = 1 > 0, which satisfies the criteria.

I'm not exactly sure how to employ induction (or the 'otherwise' method), from what I understand I need to prove that xn+1 - 1 > 0, as then the base case (n=1) and all other cases are proved... on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is that middle term -(1/4)xn or -1/(4xn)?
 
Yes, you seem to be on the right track.

To use induction, you need to prove two things:

1) that your statement is true for a particular case.
2) that your statement being true for one case implies that it is true for the next case.

I assume you meant to write (8xn - 1)/(4xn + 3) there.

So 1) is easy, you already proved it.
For 2), can you show that if xn > 1, xn+1 > 1 for all n [tex]\in[/tex] N?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K