Proving square root of 2 is irrational with well ordering principle?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the square root of 2 is irrational using the well ordering principle. Participants are exploring the implications of the well ordering principle, particularly in relation to the nature of square root of 2 and its classification within the number sets.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning how the well ordering principle applies to the square root of 2, which is not a natural number. There is an exploration of whether the principle can be used to demonstrate irrationality or if it merely indicates that square root of 2 is not a natural number. Some participants are attempting to outline a proof by assuming square root of 2 is rational and deriving contradictions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants raising questions about the applicability of the well ordering principle to rational numbers and the implications of their findings. Some guidance has been offered regarding the definition of well ordering and hints towards structuring the proof.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the application of the well ordering principle to sets that include rational numbers, as well as the specific requirements of the proof being discussed. Participants are also considering the definitions and properties of the sets involved in the proof.

symaticc
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I know how to prove that square root of 2 is irrational using the well ordering principle but what I'm wondering is, how can we use the well ordering principle to prove this when the square root of two isn't even a subset of the natural numbers? Doesn't the well ordering principle only hold for natural numbers and not rational numbers? If we prove that the well ordering principle does not hold for the square root of 2, aren't we just proving that the square root of 2 is not a natural number?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you include the proof here?? Where exactly did you use well-ordering of rational numbers??
 
Okay so what I did was first, assume that square root of 2 is rational. let √2 = a/b
2 = a^2/b^2
2b^2 = a^2
a^2 is even therefore a is even so it can be written as 2n...
2b^2 = (2n)^2
2b^b = 4n^2
b^2 = 2n^2
2 = b^2 / n^2
√2 = b/n
Since we started with √2 = a/b and then got √2 = b/n where b/n < a/b, if we repeat the step above and keep repeating it, we will always get smaller representations of √2 which means that there is no smallest element and there for √2 is irrational by the well ordering principle which states that every non-empty subset of N has a least element.

Im wondering, if the well ordering principle is only for subsets of N and it doesn't hold for √2, doesn't that just mean that √2 is not a natural number? How does that prove that √2 is irrational?
 
By definition, a set S is well ordered if every non-empty subset of S contains a least element. The set of positive rational numbers is not well-ordered because, for example,

[tex]\{\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{3}, \frac{1}{4}, \dots \}[/tex]

has no least element.

I take it that you've been asked to prove that [itex]\sqrt{2}[/itex] is irrational by using the well ordering property of the positive integers. Here's a hint to get you started. Assume that [itex]\sqrt{2} = \frac{a}{b}[/itex] where a and b are positive integers. Thus, [itex]b\sqrt{2} = a[/itex] is a positive integer. This implies that the set S, defined by

[tex]S = \{n \in \mathbb{N} : n\sqrt{2} \in \mathbb{N}\}[/tex]

is non-empty. What does the well ordering principle tell you about S?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
20K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
38K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K