Proving Subring: Odd Denominator Fractions in Q

  • Thread starter Thread starter silvermane
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the set of all fractions with odd denominators within the rational numbers Q forms a subring. Key properties to demonstrate include the existence of an additive identity (0), additive inverses, closure under addition, the existence of a multiplicative identity (1), and closure under multiplication. The associative property of multiplication is acknowledged as inherited from the larger ring of rational numbers. Participants confirm that not all ring properties need to be shown, as some are already established by the nature of the elements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring theory, specifically the definitions of a ring and subring.
  • Familiarity with operations in algebra, particularly addition and multiplication.
  • Knowledge of rational numbers and their properties.
  • Basic understanding of additive and multiplicative identities.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of subrings in abstract algebra.
  • Learn about additive and multiplicative identities in ring theory.
  • Research closure properties in algebraic structures.
  • Explore examples of subrings within different number systems.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying abstract algebra, and educators looking to reinforce concepts of ring theory and subring properties.

silvermane
Gold Member
Messages
113
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Inside the rational numbers Q, let's say we have a collection of all fractions where they all have an odd denominator. Prove that this collection is a subring of Q.

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that a ring is a set, R, with two operations, + and *, and two special elements, 0 and 1, that satisfy:

1.) R with the operation + is a group with identity 0, called the zero element of R. The element b so that a+b = b+a = 0 is the negative of a.
2.) R with the operation * satisfies the associative property, and the element 1 is the identity element under multiplication.
3.) R with + and * satisfies the distributive laws: for every a, b, c in R, a(b+c) = (ab)+(ac), and (a+b)c = (ac) + (bc).

I know these are some of the rules, but I don't know if I just have to show that these are true for our set {..., -1/5,-1/3, -1, 0 , 1, 1/3, 1/5, ...} or if there are more to show. Any helpful hints or tips would be well appreciated!

Thank you for your help in advance! :))
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don’t have to show all of those properties, for example you know * is associative because it’s elements come from a ring.

You just need to show it has the additive identity, additive inverses, it’s closed under addition, has multiplicative identity, and it’s closed under multiplication. Everything else comes from it already being part of a ring.
 
JonF said:
You don’t have to show all of those properties, for example you know * is associative because it’s elements come from a ring.

You just need to show it has the additive identity, additive inverses, it’s closed under addition, has multiplicative identity, and it’s closed under multiplication. Everything else comes from it already being part of a ring.

Okay, that works. I just wanted to make sure I was on the right track. Thanks! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K