Proving t^2/r^3: What Went Wrong?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the relationship t^2/r^3 using the equations for centripetal force and gravitational force. The user attempts to derive the formula but ends up with a ratio of r^2/t^2 instead of the expected r^2/t^3. The key error identified is in the algebraic manipulation of the equations, particularly in how the terms were simplified. The user is seeking clarification on their mistake and how to correctly arrive at the desired ratio. Ultimately, the issue is attributed to incorrect algebraic steps in the derivation process.
jackrc11
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In our unit on centripetal force, a large portion of the unit has been focusing on gravity and how the orbit is related to centripetal force. Our teacher told us to prove t^2/r^3 using F=(mv^2)/r and F=G(mM/r^2) as a small side part of our homework

Homework Equations


t^2/r^3
F=(mv^2)/r
F=G(mM/r^2)

where G = 6.67*10^-11
M and m are the objects' masses

The Attempt at a Solution


(mv^2)/r = G(mM/r^2)
mv^2 = G(mM/r)
v^2 = GM/r

giving

4(pi^2)(r^2)/t^2 = GM/r
and
GM = v^2 / r = 4(pi^2)r

GM/r = (4pi^2)r / r = 4pi^2

4(pi^2)(r^2)/t^2 = (4pi^2)

leaving the ratio
r^2 / t^2

When it should be r^2 / t^3. What did I do wrong? Was there something I forgot?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jackrc11 said:

Homework Statement


In our unit on centripetal force, a large portion of the unit has been focusing on gravity and how the orbit is related to centripetal force. Our teacher told us to prove t^2/r^3 using F=(mv^2)/r and F=G(mM/r^2) as a small side part of our homework

Homework Equations


t^2/r^3
F=(mv^2)/r
F=G(mM/r^2)

where G = 6.67*10^-11
M and m are the objects' masses

The Attempt at a Solution


(mv^2)/r = G(mM/r^2)
mv^2 = G(mM/r)
v^2 = GM/r

giving

4(pi^2)(r^2)/t^2 = GM/r ##\ \ ## How do you go from this line
and
GM = v^2 / r = 4(pi^2)r ##\ \ ## to this line ?

GM/r = (4pi^2)r / r = 4pi^2

4(pi^2)(r^2)/t^2 = (4pi^2)

leaving the ratio
r^2 / t^2

When it should be r^2 / t^3. What did I do wrong? Was there something I forgot?
It's just bad algebra.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top