Proving that a Noether charge is constant

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a Noether charge, defined as \( Q=\int d^{3}xJ^{0}(\vec{x},t) \), is constant in time, specifically that \( \dot{Q}=0 \). The subject area includes concepts from field theory and conservation laws.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equation of motion for the field \( \phi \) and its implications for the current \( J^{\mu} \). There are attempts to differentiate the charge \( Q \) with respect to time and relate it to the divergence of the current. Questions arise about the meaning of \( \partial_{\mu}J^{\mu}=0 \) and how it connects to the time derivative of \( Q \).

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various aspects of the problem, including the implications of the equation of motion and the conservation of charge. Some guidance has been provided regarding the relationship between the divergence of the current and the components of \( J^{\mu} \), but no consensus has been reached on the final steps to prove that \( \dot{Q}=0 \).

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the manipulation of terms and the proper application of equations of motion. Participants express uncertainty about their reasoning and the correctness of their approaches.

Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Hey guys, so I gota prove that the charge

[itex]Q=\int d^{3}xJ^{0}(\vec{x},t)[/itex]

is constant in time, that [itex]\dot{Q}=0[/itex]

Homework Equations



[itex]J^{\mu}=i[\phi^{\dagger}(\partial^{\mu}\phi)-(\partial^{\mu}\phi^{\dagger})\phi][/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



So first what I did was find [itex]J^{0}=i[\phi^{\dagger}\dot{\phi}-\dot{\phi^{\dagger}}\phi][/itex]

Then plug this into Q and differentiate it w.r.t. time, which gives us:

[itex]\dot{Q}=i\int d^{3}x(\phi^{\dagger}\ddot{\phi}-\ddot{\phi^{\dagger}}\phi)[/itex]

And erm, provided I've done it all right (which I probably haven't lol!) i don't know how to show that this is 0?

Thanks in advance guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the equation of motion for ##\phi##?
 
Hmm, I get something like [itex]2\Box\phi+m^{2}\phi^{\dagger}=0[/itex]...but I don't know how to use this?

EDIT - actually that's wrong lol you can't have phi and phi^dagger mixing! omg I need to find out what I am doing wrong
 
Okay so I am sure the equation of motion for phi is

[itex](\Box+m^{2})\phi=0[/itex]
 
So what does this tell you about ##\partial_\mu J^\mu##?
 
i know that [itex]\partial_{\mu}J^{\mu}=0[/itex] but I don't see how this helps...i know I am stupid lol -.-
 
There are several ways of using it leading to the conservation of charge (assuming that the current vanishes at infinity). Let us start with the straight forward one: What does ##\partial_\mu J^\mu =0## tell you in terms of components? Can you relate this to something that you can find in an expression for ##\dot Q##?
 
right, so [itex]\partial_{\mu}J^{\mu}=\partial_{0}J^{0}+\partial_{i}J^{i}[/itex] where i goes from 1 to 3 for the 3 spatial components, and the 0th component is time. The problem is that Q dot is just a time derivative...so how do I proceed?
 
wait...if [itex]\partial_{\mu}J^{\mu}=0[/itex] does that mean that each term in the sum expansion is 0? so that [itex]\partial_{0}J^{0}=0[/itex]?
 
  • #10
So you have ##\partial_0 J^0 = - \partial_i J^i = - \vec\nabla \cdot \vec J## and your integral is over space. To paraphrase Monty Python: "Hint, hint, nudge, nudge, know what I mean?" ;)
 
  • #11
Hmm its gona be something obvious I just can't see it :S
 
  • #12
Hey is it true that [itex]\phi\partial_{0}(\partial^{0}\phi^{\dagger})=\phi^{\dagger}\partial_{0}(\partial^{0}\phi)[/itex]? If so then I think I got it lol!
 
  • #13
Yes, this is one of those things you will bang your head into the desk when you realize. ;)
I really find it hard to tell you more without giving the answer away ...

But let me drop a hint on the other approach before I go to bed: You can rewrite the charge ##Q## as
$$
Q(t) = \int_S d^3x J^0(\vec x, t) = \int_S d^3x\, n_\mu J^\mu,
$$
where ##S## is space at time ##t## and ##n## is the time-like normal vector to ##S## (i.e., (1,0,0,0) in your coordinate system). What is then ##Q(t) - Q(0)##?

Edit: Just one more thing which is basically just writing down what you know already ... How can you rewrite the following?
$$
\int_V (\vec\nabla \cdot \vec A(\vec x)) d^3x
$$
 
  • #14
aww I think I like the other approach lol XD You've helped me a bunch man I owe you one! I think I'll get it eventually :P

Thanks again man sleep well!
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
13K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K