Proving that f(x) is Not Continuous for All Real Numbers c

  • Thread starter Thread starter phyguy321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Proofs
phyguy321
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
the function f(x) = 1 if x is rational
f(x) = 0 if x is irrational is not continuous for all real numbers, c



the function f(x) = x if x is rational
f(x) = 0 if x is irrationa is continuous at x=0 and not continuous for all other real numbers c

the function f(x) = 1/q if x is rational and x = p/q in lowest terms
f(x) = 0 if x is irrational
is continuous at c if c is irrational and not continuous at c if c is rational

I'm terrible at proofs, please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi phyguy321;! :smile:

(have an epsilon: ε and a delta: δ :smile:)

Let's start with:
phyguy321 said:
the function f(x) = x if x is rational
f(x) = 0 if x is irrationa is continuous at x=0 and not continuous for all other real numbers c

Can you use an ε and δ method to prove that it is continuous at x = 0?

Have a go. :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi phyguy321;! :smile:

(have an epsilon: ε and a delta: δ :smile:)

Let's start with:


Can you use an ε and δ method to prove that it is continuous at x = 0?

Have a go. :smile:


I've got the proof for when f(x) is continuous at x=0 but I'm not sure how to prove that its discontinuous at every other value using delta epsilon. I understand it has to do with the density property of real numbers and that its full of holes be cause between every real number there exists rational and irrational numbers.
 

Attachments

phyguy321 said:
I've got the proof for when f(x) is continuous at x=0 but I'm not sure how to prove that its discontinuous at every other value using delta epsilon. I understand it has to do with the density property of real numbers and that its full of holes be cause between every real number there exists rational and irrational numbers.

Hi phyguy321! :smile:

Same method … start "if x ≠ 0, then for any ε < x, … " :wink:
 
but how do i say if |x-c|<delta then |f(x) - f(not zero)|< epsilon?
 
phyguy321 said:
but how do i say if |x-c|<delta then |f(x) - f(not zero)|< epsilon?

But it's not continuous, so there isn't a δ.

You should be trying to prove that, no matter how small δ is, the neighbourhood will contain values that further away than ε. :smile:
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top