MHB Proving that $S_1 \cdot S_2 \in S$

  • Thread starter Thread starter jakncoke1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the product of two functions from the class S, defined as functions from [0, ∞) to [0, ∞), also belongs to S. It establishes that both functions S1 = e^x - 1 and S2 = ln(x + 1) are members of S. The properties of S include closure under addition and composition, as well as the condition that if one function dominates another, their difference remains in S. The challenge is to demonstrate that the product of any two functions f(x) and g(x) in S also satisfies the criteria to be in S. Successfully proving this would reinforce the robustness of the class S regarding multiplication.
jakncoke1
Messages
48
Reaction score
1
Problem: Let S be the class of functions from $[0, \infty)$ to $[0, \infty)$ such that

1) $S_1 = e^{x} - 1, S_2 = ln(x + 1)$ are in S
2)if f(x), g(x) $\in S$, then f(x)+g(x), f(g(x)) are also in S
3)if f(x), g(x) $\in S$, and f(x) $\geq$ g(x) for $x \geq 0$, then f(x) - g(x) is in S

Prove that if f(x), g(x) $\in S$, then f(x)g(x) $\in S$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is also quite easy. It borders on realizing log(x) + log(y) = log(xy) and $e^{log(xy)} = xy$.

Assume f(x),g(x) $\in S$, then ln(f(x)+1) + ln(g(x) + 1) $\in S$, since this is just composing functions already in S.ln(f(x)+1) + ln(g(x) + 1) = ln( (f(x) + 1)(g(x) + 1) ) = ln( f(x)g(x) + f(x) + g(x) + 1)

Composing again with $e^{x} - 1$, we get $f(x)g(x) + f(x) + g(x) + 1 - 1 = f(x)g(x) + f(x) + g(x)$.

Since f(x)g(x) $ \geq 0$, f(x)g(x) + f(x) + g(x) $\geq $ f(x) + g(x) for all $x \geq 0$.
so

f(x)g(x) + f(x) + g(x) - f(x) - g(x) = f(x)g(x) $\in S$.

QED
 
  • Like
Likes Wobert
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top