Proving that the scalar product is invariant

Someone1987
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Is there a general way of proving that the scalar product
xuxu = (x0)2 - (x1)2 - (x2)2 - (x3)2
is invariant under a Lorentz transformation that applies no matter the explicit form of the transformation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First derive the form of a Lorentz transform in an arbitrary direction.
Then check that the scalar product is invariant.
 
You could take the requirement that this "scalar product" is invariant (and the requirement that a Lorentz transformation is a linear transformation) as the definition of a Lorentz transformation. If you do, you don't have to prove that it's invariant.

An alternative is to define a (homogeneous) Lorentz transformation as a linear map x\mapsto\Lambda x:\mathbb R^4\rightarrow\mathbb R^4 such that \Lambda^T\eta\Lambda=\eta (where ^T is the transpose of the 4x4 matrix). The "scalar product" <x,y> of x and y is then defined by \langle x,y\rangle=x^T\eta y. If you know anything about matrices you should find it easy to prove that \langle\Lambda x,\Lambda y\rangle=\langle x,y\rangle when \Lambda is a Lorentz transformation.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Back
Top