Proving the Convergence of a Geometric Series with a Tricky Sum Equation

AI Thread Summary
A geometric series with a first term of 1 has its sum of the first five terms equal to twice the sum of the terms from the 6th to the 15th. The equation derived from this relationship is 2r^4 - 1 = r^{14} - r^4. Participants discussed the proper application of the geometric series sum formula and pointed out potential errors in the original calculations. The correct sums for the first five and the 6th to 15th terms were clarified, leading to the equation that needs to be solved for r^5. The conversation concluded with considerations about the validity of negative solutions in the context of convergence.
misogynisticfeminist
Messages
370
Reaction score
0
I've got a problem here...

A geometric series has first term 1,the sum of the first 5 terms is twice that of the sum of the 6th to 15th term inclusive. Prove that r^5= \frac{1}{2} \sqrt {3-1}

What i did was...

2s_5=s_{15}-s_5

using the formula for the sum of a GS, i got...

2r^4 -1 =r^{14} -r^4

and things when downhill from there.

I've tried expressing it in terms of x^5 because the answer seems to suggest the quadratic formula. But i don't seem to be getting anywhere. Can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, it may be me with a wrong calculation, or is it the answer wrong?
Anyway, I'll give you a hint:
A_1 = 1
A_n = r ^ {n - 1}
So A_6 = ?
If you assume A_6 the first term of another geometric series, with the same r, can you find the sum of the first 10 terms (6th - 15th)?
Viet dao,
 
Last edited:
A few things. Is that 3-1? Or, as I like to call it, 2? Also, the formula for the sum of a geometric series, from r^n to r^m is (r^(m+1) - r^n)/(r-1). And finally, didn't you say the sum of first set was twice the sum of the second? Because it looks like you have that backwards in your equation.
 
The first term is one so this series is just 1+ r+ r2+ r3+ ... for some r.
The sum of the first five terms is \frac{1-r^6}{1-r} and the sum of the "6th to 15th term" is "sum of first 15 terms minus sum of first 5 terms":
\frac{1-r^{16}}{1-r}-\frac{1-r^6}{1-r}= \frac{r^6-r^16}{1-r}.
We are told that "sum of the first 5 terms is twice that of the sum of the 6th to 15th term" so solve the equation \frac{1-r^6}{1-r}= \frac{r^6-r^16}{1-r}. Solve that for r5.
 
I think those powers should be 5 and 15. The fifth term of the series is r^4. And the actual answer has the 1 outside the radical, but still multiplied by 1/2.
 
Isn't this the sum of the first 5 terms:
S_5 = 1 + r + r^2 + r^3 + r^4 = \frac{r^5 - 1}{r - 1}
Or this:
S_5 = 1 + r + r^2 + r^3 + r^4 + r^5= \frac{r^6 - 1}{r - 1}?
Viet Dao,
 
StatusX said:
I think those powers should be 5 and 15. The fifth term of the series is r^4. And the actual answer has the 1 outside the radical, but still multiplied by 1/2.

I agree with this. Is the negative solution invalid? I don't see why it would be. There is no reason why the series has to converge for infinite n.

<br /> r^5 = \frac{{ \pm \sqrt 3 - 1}}{2} \ \ ??<br />
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top