Proving the Increasing Nature of the Sequence x_n=(1+1/n)^n

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the sequence x_n = (1 + 1/n)^n is increasing, specifically showing that x_{n+1} ≥ x_n. Initial attempts using induction were challenging, particularly in establishing the necessary inequalities. Participants suggested using the Binomial Theorem for expansion, which helps clarify the relationship between x_n and x_{n+1}. Ultimately, the consensus is that the Binomial expansion provides a valid method to demonstrate the increasing nature of the sequence. The discussion emphasizes the importance of finding the right approach to tackle such mathematical proofs.
MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
i need to prove that the sequence is increasing, i.e, x_n+1>=x_n
which translates into:
[(n+2)/(n+1)]^(n+1)>=[(n+1)/n]^n

i tried through induction but got stumbled:
n=k
[(k+2)/(k+1)]^(k+1)>= [(k+1)/k]^k

n=k+1
[(k+3)/(k+2)]^(k+2)>=[(k+2)/(k+1)]^(k+1)
now i need to prove the last inequality, and got baffled.
any help is appreciated, perhaps induction isn't the right way?

p.s
i know this sequence converges to e, so spare me the trivial details about this sequence.
thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The derivative is > 0
 
Last edited:
SteveRives said:
For n > 0, its derivative is > 0. Therefore increasing.
So how do you show that
\ln \left(1+\frac{1}{x} \right) > \frac{1}{x+1}, \, x>0
 
forgot to say that derivatives aren't allowed, or at least haven't yet been covered, this problem is from here:
http://www.maths.mq.edu.au/~wchen/lnfafolder/fa02-sl.pdf
page 14, the last problem.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
loop quantum gravity said:
i need to prove that the sequence is increasing, i.e, x_n+1>=x_n
which translates into:
[(n+2)/(n+1)]^(n+1)>=[(n+1)/n]^n

i tried through induction but got stumbled:
n=k
[(k+2)/(k+1)]^(k+1)>= [(k+1)/k]^k

n=k+1
[(k+3)/(k+2)]^(k+2)>=[(k+2)/(k+1)]^(k+1)
now i need to prove the last inequality, and got baffled.
any help is appreciated, perhaps induction isn't the right way?

p.s
i know this sequence converges to e, so spare me the trivial details about this sequence.
thanks in advance.

Try with induction by blocks (blocks of 2^k).
 
Or I think you can also expand the terms out, something like:
x_n = \left( 1 + \frac{1}{n} \right) ^ n
So:
x_n = 1 + n \times \frac{1}{n} + \frac{n (n - 1)}{2!} \times \frac{1}{n ^ 2} + \frac{n (n - 1) (n - 2)}{3!} \times \frac{1}{n ^ 3} + ... + \frac{n (n - 1) (n - 2) ... (n - (n - 1))}{n!} \times \frac{1}{n ^ n}
= 1 + 1 + \frac{1}{2!} \times \frac{n}{n} \times \frac{n - 1}{n} + \frac{1}{3!} \times \frac{n}{n} \times \frac{n - 1}{n} \times \frac{n - 2}{n} + ... + \frac{1}{n!} \times \frac{n}{n} \times \frac{n - 1}{n} \times \frac{n - 2}{n} \times ... \times \times \frac{n - (n - 1)}{n}
= 1 + 1 + \frac{1}{2!} \times \left( 1 - \frac{1}{n} \right) + \frac{1}{3!} \times \left( 1 - \frac{1}{n} \right) \times \left( 1 - \frac{2}{n} \right) + ... + \frac{1}{n!} \times \left(1 - \frac{1}{n} \right) \times \left(1 - \frac{2}{n} \right) \times ... \times \left(1 - \frac{n - 1}{n} \right)
You can do the same and come up with:
x_{n + 1} = 1 + 1 + \frac{1}{2!} \times \left( 1 - \frac{1}{n + 1} \right) + \frac{1}{3!} \times \left( 1 - \frac{1}{n + 1} \right) \times \left( 1 - \frac{2}{n + 1} \right) + ... + \frac{1}{(n + 1)!} \times \left(1 - \frac{1}{n + 1} \right) \times
\times \left(1 - \frac{2}{n + 1} \right) \times ... \times \left(1 - \frac{n}{n + 1} \right)
So can you say that xn + 1 > xn?
Viet Dao,
 
Last edited:
vietdao, from this expansion the inequality does follow.
but the question how did you arrive to it?
have you used Newton's binomial?
 
Binomial Theorem: (can be proved inductively)

(a+b)^n=\sum_{i=0}^n \frac{n!}{i! (n-i)!}a^ib^{n-i}

here a=1, b=1/n
 
well thank you all, i should have thought of Newton's binomial.
 
Back
Top