Proving the Log of a Power Rule: log(n^k) is O(log(n)) for any constant k > 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gear2d
  • Start date Start date
Gear2d
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
I was wondering how would I go about proving the Log of a Power Rule:

log(n^k) is O(log(n)) for any constant k > 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think of a basic property of logarithms
 
You should show what you've tried, but basically..

log (n^k) = k log (n), and use w/e technique you want to show the constant up front does not matter.

OR are you asking how to prove the power rule for logs? I'll give a hint..

log (x) = y <=> 10^y = x

(assuming log has base 10 and <=> means if and only if).
 
mistermath said:
You should show what you've tried, but basically..

log (n^k) = k log (n), and use w/e technique you want to show the constant up front does not matter.

OR are you asking how to prove the power rule for logs? I'll give a hint..

log (x) = y <=> 10^y = x

(assuming log has base 10 and <=> means if and only if).

I see what you are saying when log (n^k) = k log (n) which is O(log (n)) based on Coefficient Rule ( http://www.augustana.ca/~hackw/csc210/exhibit/chap04/bigOhRules.html ). But, I am trying to prove the power rule for logs. Just don't know how to approach it or where to start off. And the log is base 2 and not 10 (sorry for got to mention that).
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top